From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:34:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920073426.GA26073@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c17b7ac8-961b-8e3f-902f-40b18b80c993@amd.com>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 08:50:20AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> "..shared_aligned" section does not start and end with page-size alignment.
Nowhere in the code there's a comment saying: "This percpu section really must
be page-size aligned because <reasons>." You need to be more verbose
with requirements like that.
Also, you're ending up needing a whole page per-CPU for those variables.
And now with the alignment before and after, you have worst-case two
pages fragmentation of percpu memory and percpu memory is a rather
limited resource AFAIR.
If only there were a alloc_percpu_page()...
> Since the C-bit works on PAGE_SIZE alignment hence the "..unencrypted" section
Btw, call that section "..decrypted" and everywhere do
s/unencrypted/decrypted/g.
> starts and ends with page-size alignment. The closest I can find is
> "..page_aligned" but again it does not end with page-size alignment.
>
> Additionally, since we clear the C-bit from unencrypted section hence we
> should avoid overloading the existing section -- we don't want to expose more
> than we wish.
Add that to the comment too.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170916123418.37807-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 3:13 ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-19 10:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 10:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 13:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 13:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-20 7:34 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-09-20 7:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-20 16:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-20 16:16 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170920073426.GA26073@nazgul.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).