From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable() Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20170930103855.GA9309@osiris> References: <150670038738.23930.7190484711222807884.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <150670117817.23930.13068785028558453848.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20170930092002.GA4623@osiris> <20170930123612.0fb250fe@mschwideX1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170930123612.0fb250fe@mschwideX1> Sender: linux-alpha-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Kirill Tkhai , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, avagin@virtuozzo.com, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, gorcunov@virtuozzo.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mattst88@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, tglx@linutronix.de, rth@twiddle.net, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, rientjes@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:36:12PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:20:02 +0200 > Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 07:06:18PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > > Similar to __down_write_killable(), and read killable primitive. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai > > > --- > > > arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h > > > > FWIW, while looking into this patch I realized that we never optimized our > > rwsem primitives to make use of new atomic instructions. > > > > The generic rwsem header file however does, since it uses atomic ops which > > we did optimize. Even when compiling for old machines the generic version > > generates better code. Therefore I will remove the 15 years old s390 > > implementation and switch to the generic version instead. > > Take care not to conflict with the queued spinlock/rwlock patches on the > features branch. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=eb3b7b848fb3dd00f7a57d633d4ae4d194aa7865 > > Me thinks that what you have in mind is already done. No, it's not done. You probably mixed up rwlocks and rwsems? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33808 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752770AbdI3KjF (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:39:05 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v8UAcwaW093168 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:39:05 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2da7eacpqp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:39:05 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:39:02 +0100 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:38:55 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable() References: <150670038738.23930.7190484711222807884.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <150670117817.23930.13068785028558453848.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20170930092002.GA4623@osiris> <20170930123612.0fb250fe@mschwideX1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170930123612.0fb250fe@mschwideX1> Message-ID: <20170930103855.GA9309@osiris> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Kirill Tkhai , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, avagin@virtuozzo.com, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, gorcunov@virtuozzo.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mattst88@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, tglx@linutronix.de, rth@twiddle.net, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, rientjes@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20170930103855.LfmmeTWZLSFqvNrmVWyuYCROQnaWdGtPr5HB9mEisTE@z> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:36:12PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:20:02 +0200 > Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 07:06:18PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > > Similar to __down_write_killable(), and read killable primitive. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai > > > --- > > > arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h > > > > FWIW, while looking into this patch I realized that we never optimized our > > rwsem primitives to make use of new atomic instructions. > > > > The generic rwsem header file however does, since it uses atomic ops which > > we did optimize. Even when compiling for old machines the generic version > > generates better code. Therefore I will remove the 15 years old s390 > > implementation and switch to the generic version instead. > > Take care not to conflict with the queued spinlock/rwlock patches on the > features branch. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=eb3b7b848fb3dd00f7a57d633d4ae4d194aa7865 > > Me thinks that what you have in mind is already done. No, it's not done. You probably mixed up rwlocks and rwsems?