From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.16.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:24:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019092434.GA16355@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018134022.25282-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 02:40:22PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Commit e88d62cd4b2f0b1ae55e9008e79c2794b1fc914d upstream.
>
> As raw_cpu_generic_read() is a plain read from a raw_cpu_ptr() address,
> it's possible (albeit unlikely) that the compiler will split the access
> across multiple instructions.
>
> In this_cpu_generic_read() we disable preemption but not interrupts
> before calling raw_cpu_generic_read(). Thus, an interrupt could be taken
> in the middle of the split load instructions. If a this_cpu_write() or
> RMW this_cpu_*() op is made to the same variable in the interrupt
> handling path, this_cpu_read() will return a torn value.
>
> For native word types, we can avoid tearing using READ_ONCE(), but this
> won't work in all cases (e.g. 64-bit types on most 32-bit platforms).
> This patch reworks this_cpu_generic_read() to use READ_ONCE() where
> possible, otherwise falling back to disabling interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> [Mark: backport to v3.16.y]
You sent 2 patches for 3.16.y, did you mean for one of these to be for
3.18.y?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 13:40 [PATCH v3.16.y] percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read() atomic w.r.t. interrupts Mark Rutland
2017-10-18 13:40 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-19 9:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-10-30 14:40 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-30 14:40 ` Mark Rutland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-18 13:35 Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171019092434.GA16355@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).