From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"thor.thayer@linux.intel.com" <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] net: average: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE()
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 06:49:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024134939.GY3659@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024093412.slvps6vmluzmteru@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 21:07 +0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > >
> > > For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
> > > preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
> > > former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
> > > ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful.
> > >
> > > However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and
> > > writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This
> > > distinction is critical to correct operation.
> > >
> > > It's possible to transform the bulk of kernel code using the Coccinelle
> > > script below. However, this doesn't pick up some uses, including those
> > > in <linux/average.h>. As a preparatory step, this patch converts the
> > > file to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() consistently.
> > >
> > > At the same time, this patch addds missing includes necessary for
> > > {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), *BUG_ON*(), and ilog2().
> > >
> > > ----
> > > virtual patch
> > >
> > > @ depends on patch @
> > > expression E1, E2;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
> > > + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)
> > >
> > > @ depends on patch @
> > > expression E;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > - ACCESS_ONCE(E)
> > > + READ_ONCE(E)
> > > ----
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Let me know if you want me to apply this, since I seem to be the
> > average.h maintainer :-)
>
> Would be nice to keep these patches together if possible, so that we can remove
> ACCESS_ONCE() - or at least add a build warning.
My goal is to remove it. After all, I am the guy who added it. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-23 21:04 [GIT PULL de-alpha] Make core code not need to know about Alpha for v4.15 Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 01/19] dm integrity: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 02/19] EDAC, altera: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 03/19] firmware/ivc: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 04/19] fs: dcache: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 05/19] fs: ncpfs: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 06/19] media: dvb_ringbuffer: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 07/19] net: netlink/netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 08/19] net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 09/19] net: average: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-24 5:58 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-24 5:58 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-24 9:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 13:49 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 10/19] samples: mic/mpssd/mpssd.c: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 11/19] selftests/powerpc: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 12/19] workqueue: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 13/19] rcutorture: formal: Prepare for ACCESS_ONCE() removal Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 14/19] doc: filesystems: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 15/19] mm: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 16/19] linux/compiler.h: Split into compiler.h and compiler-types.h Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-24 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:30 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-24 9:30 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-24 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 17/19] locking/barriers: Kill lockless_dereference Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-24 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:44 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-24 9:44 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-24 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 10:23 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 18/19] alpha: atomics: Add smp_read_barrier_depends() to release/relaxed atomics Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-23 21:07 ` [PATCH 19/19] COCCINELLE: treewide: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-24 9:32 ` [GIT PULL de-alpha] Make core code not need to know about Alpha for v4.15 Ingo Molnar
2017-10-24 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-25 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-25 8:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-25 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-25 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-25 13:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024134939.GY3659@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=thor.thayer@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).