From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:43260 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932952AbeBVQCV (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:02:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:02:17 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support Message-ID: <20180222160217.GA18243@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Kuo , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Chen Liqin , Lennox Wu , Guan Xuetao , Guenter Roeck , Al Viro , James Hogan , linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, David Howells On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > There are also a couple of architectures that are more or less > unmaintained but do have working gcc support: FR-V and M32R > have been orphaned for a while and are not getting updated > MN10300 is still maintained officially by David Howells but doesn't > seem any more active than the other two, the last real updates were > in 2013. I'd love to see dead architecture ports dropped if they really are more or less abandoned. In addition to your missing gcc port ones above (minus openrisc) it seems like frv and m32r certainly qualify, and xtensa seems to be going that way with the glibc port being dropped now.