From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:33088 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933516AbeBVSEZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:04:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:04:20 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support Message-ID: <20180222180420.GA17956@infradead.org> References: <20180222160217.GA18243@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Max Filippov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Kuo , "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." , Chen Liqin , Lennox Wu , Guan Xuetao , Guenter Roeck , Al Viro , James Hogan , "open list:METAG ARCHITECTURE" , Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, David Howells On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:14:11AM -0800, Max Filippov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I'd love to see dead architecture ports dropped if they really are > > more or less abandoned. In addition to your missing gcc port ones > > above (minus openrisc) it seems like frv and m32r certainly qualify, > > and xtensa seems to be going that way with the glibc port being dropped > > now. > > It's not that it's been dropped, there have never been an official glibc > port for xtensa, but we're working to get one. Ah sorry - I meant to say tile not xtensa when writing this.