From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Documentation/features: Provide and apply "features-refresh.sh"
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 06:56:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180404045632.uniwfrl32bjmsn5g@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522774551-9503-1-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
* Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> In Ingo's words [1]:
>
> "[...] what should be done instead is to write a script that refreshes
> all the arch-support.txt files in-place. [...]
>
> It's OK for the script to have various quirks for weirdly implemented
> features and exceptions: i.e. basically whenever it gets a feature wrong,
> we can just tweak the script with quirks to make it all work out of box.
>
> [...] But in the end there should only be a single new script:
>
> Documentation/features/scripts/features-refresh.sh
>
> ... which operates on the arch-support.txt files and refreshes them in
> place, and which, after all the refreshes have been committed, should
> produce an empty 'git diff' result."
>
> "[...] New features can then be added by basically just creating a
> header-only arch-support.txt file, such as:
>
> triton:~/tip/Documentation/features> cat foo/bar/arch-support.txt
> #
> # Feature name: shiny new fubar kernel feature
> # Kconfig: ARCH_USE_FUBAR
> # description: arch supports the fubar feature
> #
>
> And running Documentation/features/scripts/features-refresh.sh would
> auto-generate the arch support matrix. [...]
>
> This way we soft- decouple the refreshing of the entries from the
> introduction of the features, while still making it all easy to keep
> sync and to extend."
>
> This RFC presents a first attempt to implement such a feature/script, and
> applies it script on top of Arnd's:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git arch-removal
>
> Patch 1/3 provides the "features-refresh.sh" script. Patch 2/3 removes the
> "BPF-JIT" feature file and it creates header-only files for "cBPF-JIT" and
> "eBPF-JIT". Patch 3/3 presents the results of running the script; this run
> also printed to standard output the following warnings:
>
> WARNING: '__HAVE_ARCH_STRNCASECMP' is not a valid Kconfig
> WARNING: 'Optimized asm/rwsem.h' is not a valid Kconfig
> WARNING: '!ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET' is not a valid Kconfig
> WARNING: '__HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL' is not a valid Kconfig
>
> (I'm sending these patches with empty commit messagges, for early feedback:
> I'll fill in these messages in subsequent versions if this makes sense...)
>
> Cheers,
> Andrea
>
> Andrea Parri (3):
> Documentation/features: Add script that refreshes the arch support status files in place
> Documentation/features/core: Add arch support status files for 'cBPF-JIT' and 'eBPF-JIT'
> Documentation/features: Refresh and auto-generate the arch support status files in place
Ok, this series is really impressive at its RFC stage already!
Beyond fixing those warnings, I'd also suggest another change: please make the
new BPF features patch the last one, so that the 'refresh' patch shows how much
original bit-rot we gathered recently.
The 'new features' patch should then also include the result of also running the
script, i.e. a single patch adding the base fields and the generated parts as
well. That will be the usual development flow anyway - people won't do two-part
patches just to show which bits are by hand and which are auto-generated.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-04 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 16:55 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Documentation/features: Provide and apply "features-refresh.sh" Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] Documentation/features: Add script that refreshes the arch support status files in place Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] Documentation/features/core: Add arch support status files for 'cBPF-JIT' and 'eBPF-JIT' Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] Documentation/features: Refresh and auto-generate the arch support status files in place Andrea Parri
2018-04-03 16:55 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-04 4:56 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-04-04 4:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Documentation/features: Provide and apply "features-refresh.sh" Ingo Molnar
2018-04-04 13:03 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-04 13:03 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-05 15:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-04-05 15:18 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180404045632.uniwfrl32bjmsn5g@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).