From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: PAGE_KERNEL_* fallbacks Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 18:44:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20180516164403.GI27853@wotan.suse.de> References: <20180510185507.2439-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180510185507.2439-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:55:05AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This is the 3rd iteration for moving PAGE_KERNEL_* fallback > definitions into asm-generic headers. Greg asked for a Changelog > for patch iteration changes, its below. > > All these patches have been tested by 0-day. > > Questions, and specially flames are greatly appreciated. *Poke* Who's tree should this go through? Luis > > v3: > > Removed documentation effort to keep tabs on which architectures > currently don't defint the respective PAGE_* flags. Keeping tabs > on this is just not worth it. > > Ran a spell checker on all patches :) > > v2: > > I added a patch for PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC as suggested by Matthew Wilcox. > > v1: > > I sent out a patch just for dealing witht he fallback mechanism for > PAGE_KERNEL_RO. > > Luis R. Rodriguez (2): > mm: provide a fallback for PAGE_KERNEL_RO for architectures > mm: provide a fallback for PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC for architectures > > drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c | 5 ----- > include/asm-generic/pgtable.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > mm/nommu.c | 4 ---- > mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ---- > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.0 > > -- Do not panic From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33733 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750847AbeEPQoG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 12:44:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 18:44:03 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: PAGE_KERNEL_* fallbacks Message-ID: <20180516164403.GI27853@wotan.suse.de> References: <20180510185507.2439-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180510185507.2439-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20180516164403.umYjoy_f-EHgSqOYacumDJ1t-B2BUjpNHkfhG6FeduM@z> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:55:05AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This is the 3rd iteration for moving PAGE_KERNEL_* fallback > definitions into asm-generic headers. Greg asked for a Changelog > for patch iteration changes, its below. > > All these patches have been tested by 0-day. > > Questions, and specially flames are greatly appreciated. *Poke* Who's tree should this go through? Luis > > v3: > > Removed documentation effort to keep tabs on which architectures > currently don't defint the respective PAGE_* flags. Keeping tabs > on this is just not worth it. > > Ran a spell checker on all patches :) > > v2: > > I added a patch for PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC as suggested by Matthew Wilcox. > > v1: > > I sent out a patch just for dealing witht he fallback mechanism for > PAGE_KERNEL_RO. > > Luis R. Rodriguez (2): > mm: provide a fallback for PAGE_KERNEL_RO for architectures > mm: provide a fallback for PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC for architectures > > drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c | 5 ----- > include/asm-generic/pgtable.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > mm/nommu.c | 4 ---- > mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ---- > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.0 > > -- Do not panic