public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 06/20] signal/x86: Move mpx siginfo generation into do_bounds
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 02:05:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918000546.12552-6-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y3bzk6yv.fsf@xmission.com>

This separates the logic of generating the signal from the logic of
gathering the information about the bounds violation.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h | 13 ++++++++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c    | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/mm/mpx.c          | 30 +++++++++---------------------
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h
index 61eb4b63c5ec..8f55ea0cd7da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h
@@ -57,8 +57,15 @@
 #define MPX_BNDCFG_ADDR_MASK	(~((1UL<<MPX_BNDCFG_TAIL)-1))
 #define MPX_BNDSTA_ERROR_CODE	0x3
 
+struct mpx_fault_info
+{
+	void __user *addr;
+	void __user *lower;
+	void __user *upper;
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
-siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs);
+int mpx_fault_info(struct mpx_fault_info *info, struct pt_regs *regs);
 int mpx_handle_bd_fault(void);
 static inline int kernel_managing_mpx_tables(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
@@ -78,9 +85,9 @@ void mpx_notify_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 unsigned long mpx_unmapped_area_check(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
 		unsigned long flags);
 #else
-static inline siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline int mpx_fault_info(struct mpx_fault_info *info, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	return NULL;
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 static inline int mpx_handle_bd_fault(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index e6db475164ed..2155d2c7f49b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -455,7 +455,6 @@ dotraplinkage void do_double_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 dotraplinkage void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 {
 	const struct mpx_bndcsr *bndcsr;
-	siginfo_t *info;
 
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "entry code didn't wake RCU");
 	if (notify_die(DIE_TRAP, "bounds", regs, error_code,
@@ -493,8 +492,11 @@ dotraplinkage void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 			goto exit_trap;
 		break; /* Success, it was handled */
 	case 1: /* Bound violation. */
-		info = mpx_generate_siginfo(regs);
-		if (IS_ERR(info)) {
+	{
+		struct mpx_fault_info mpx;
+		struct siginfo info;
+
+		if (mpx_fault_info(&mpx, regs)) {
 			/*
 			 * We failed to decode the MPX instruction.  Act as if
 			 * the exception was not caused by MPX.
@@ -508,9 +510,16 @@ dotraplinkage void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 		 * allows and application to possibly handle the
 		 * #BR exception itself.
 		 */
-		do_trap(X86_TRAP_BR, SIGSEGV, "bounds", regs, error_code, info);
-		kfree(info);
+		clear_siginfo(&info);
+		info.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
+		info.si_errno = 0;
+		info.si_code  = SEGV_BNDERR;
+		info.si_addr  = mpx.addr;
+		info.si_lower = mpx.lower;
+		info.si_upper = mpx.upper;
+		do_trap(X86_TRAP_BR, SIGSEGV, "bounds", regs, error_code, &info);
 		break;
+	}
 	case 0: /* No exception caused by Intel MPX operations. */
 		goto exit_trap;
 	default:
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
index e500949bae24..2385538e8065 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -118,14 +118,11 @@ static int mpx_insn_decode(struct insn *insn,
  * anything it wants in to the instructions.  We can not
  * trust anything about it.  They might not be valid
  * instructions or might encode invalid registers, etc...
- *
- * The caller is expected to kfree() the returned siginfo_t.
  */
-siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs)
+int mpx_fault_info(struct mpx_fault_info *info, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	const struct mpx_bndreg_state *bndregs;
 	const struct mpx_bndreg *bndreg;
-	siginfo_t *info = NULL;
 	struct insn insn;
 	uint8_t bndregno;
 	int err;
@@ -153,11 +150,6 @@ siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	/* now go select the individual register in the set of 4 */
 	bndreg = &bndregs->bndreg[bndregno];
 
-	info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!info) {
-		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_out;
-	}
 	/*
 	 * The registers are always 64-bit, but the upper 32
 	 * bits are ignored in 32-bit mode.  Also, note that the
@@ -168,27 +160,23 @@ siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * complains when casting from integers to different-size
 	 * pointers.
 	 */
-	info->si_lower = (void __user *)(unsigned long)bndreg->lower_bound;
-	info->si_upper = (void __user *)(unsigned long)~bndreg->upper_bound;
-	info->si_addr_lsb = 0;
-	info->si_signo = SIGSEGV;
-	info->si_errno = 0;
-	info->si_code = SEGV_BNDERR;
-	info->si_addr = insn_get_addr_ref(&insn, regs);
+	info->lower = (void __user *)(unsigned long)bndreg->lower_bound;
+	info->upper = (void __user *)(unsigned long)~bndreg->upper_bound;
+	info->addr  = insn_get_addr_ref(&insn, regs);
+
 	/*
 	 * We were not able to extract an address from the instruction,
 	 * probably because there was something invalid in it.
 	 */
-	if (info->si_addr == (void __user *)-1) {
+	if (info->addr == (void __user *)-1) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto err_out;
 	}
-	trace_mpx_bounds_register_exception(info->si_addr, bndreg);
-	return info;
+	trace_mpx_bounds_register_exception(info->addr, bndreg);
+	return 0;
 err_out:
 	/* info might be NULL, but kfree() handles that */
-	kfree(info);
-	return ERR_PTR(err);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static __user void *mpx_get_bounds_dir(void)
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-18  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18  0:03 [REVIEW][PATCH 00/20] siginfo cleanups for x86 Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 01/20] signal: Simplify tracehook_report_syscall_exit Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:15   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 02/20] signal/x86: Inline fill_sigtrap_info in it's only caller send_sigtrap Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:16   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:16     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19  5:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-19  5:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-19  6:46     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-19  6:46       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 03/20] signal/x86: Move MCE error reporting out of force_sig_info_fault Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19 13:49     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-19 13:49       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 04/20] signal/x86: Use send_sig_mceerr as apropriate Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:21   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 13:04     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-01 13:04       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 05/20] signal/x86: In trace_mpx_bounds_register_exception add __user annotations Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:22   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:22     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-09-18  0:05   ` [REVIEW][PATCH 06/20] signal/x86: Move mpx siginfo generation into do_bounds Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:25   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:25     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19  5:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-19  5:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-19 13:52     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-19 13:52       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 07/20] signal/x86/traps: Factor out show_signal Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:28     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 08/20] signal/x86/traps: Move setting error_code and trap_nr into do_trap_no_signal Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:33   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:37       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-21 12:45     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-21 12:45       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-21 13:39       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-21 13:39         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 09/20] signal/x86/traps: Use force_sig_bnderr Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:34   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:34     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 10/20] signal/x86/traps: Use force_sig instead of open coding it Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:34   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:34     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 11/20] signal/x86/traps: Simplify trap generation Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 12/20] signal/x86: Remove pkey parameter from bad_area_nosemaphore Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:44     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19 16:33     ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-19 16:33       ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-21 12:34       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-21 12:34         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 13/20] signal/x86: Remove the pkey parameter from do_sigbus Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:45   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/20] signal/x86: Remove pkey parameter from mm_fault_error Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 15/20] signal/x86: Don't compute pkey in __do_page_fault Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 16/20] signal/x86: Pass pkey not vma into __bad_area Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:48     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 17/20] signal/x86: Call force_sig_pkuerr from __bad_area_nosemaphore Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:50     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 18/20] signal/x86: Replace force_sig_info_fault with force_sig_fault Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:51   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 19/20] signal/x86: Pass pkey by value Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18  0:05 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 20/20] signal/x86: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18  0:05   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 20:53   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:53     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:55 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 00/20] siginfo cleanups for x86 Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 20:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-18 21:10   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-18 21:10     ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180918000546.12552-6-ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox