From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 06:48:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20181101054831.GA4589@lst.de> References: <20181019120952.32763-1-hch@lst.de> <20181019120952.32763-7-hch@lst.de> <20181019122228.GJ30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch , linux-scsi , Linux Kbuild mailing list , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dominik Brodowski , Alex Bounine , mporter@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-arm-kernel , Russell King List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:05:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > How about letting CONFIG_ARM to select HAVE_PCI ? > > > > > I applied 1/9, 3/9, 4/9, 5/9. > (I think 2/9 should be squashed to 9/9) > > As Russell pointed out, we need to avoid > the unmet dependency. Yes, I think the HAVE_PCI is probably the nicest way, but we'll need to wait what Russell as the maintainer wants. > Are you planning to send > the updated version for 6/9 through - 9/9 ? > > If so, could you please rebase 6/9 > so that it is cleanly applicable ? Will do once I find some time after rc1. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:42421 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727533AbeKAOuC (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:50:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 06:48:31 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci Message-ID: <20181101054831.GA4589@lst.de> References: <20181019120952.32763-1-hch@lst.de> <20181019120952.32763-7-hch@lst.de> <20181019122228.GJ30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch , linux-scsi , Linux Kbuild mailing list , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dominik Brodowski , Alex Bounine , mporter@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-arm-kernel , Russell King Message-ID: <20181101054831.B4tvT4TWMp3KYkaEWubYAv4T0wGo1S7PvqPbKyWKzVI@z> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:05:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > How about letting CONFIG_ARM to select HAVE_PCI ? > > > > > I applied 1/9, 3/9, 4/9, 5/9. > (I think 2/9 should be squashed to 9/9) > > As Russell pointed out, we need to avoid > the unmet dependency. Yes, I think the HAVE_PCI is probably the nicest way, but we'll need to wait what Russell as the maintainer wants. > Are you planning to send > the updated version for 6/9 through - 9/9 ? > > If so, could you please rebase 6/9 > so that it is cleanly applicable ? Will do once I find some time after rc1.