From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: RFC: userspace exception fixups Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:52:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20181102165204.GC7393@linux.intel.com> References: <20181101185225.GC5150@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20181101193107.GE5150@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20181102163034.GB7393@linux.intel.com> <7e14ee0e-ce15-1e88-7ae9-4d0f40cb3d84@fortanix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e14ee0e-ce15-1e88-7ae9-4d0f40cb3d84@fortanix.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jethro Beekman Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Rich Felker , Jann Horn , Dave Hansen , Jarkko Sakkinen , Florian Weimer , Linux API , X86 ML , linux-arch , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , "nhorman@redhat.com" , "npmccallum@redhat.com" , "Ayoun, Serge" , "shay.katz-zamir@intel.com" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Shevchenko , Thomas List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:37:10PM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: > On 2018-11-02 09:30, Sean Christopherson wrote: > >... The intended convention for EENTER is to have an ENCLU at the AEX target ... > > > >... to further enforce that the AEX target needs to be ENCLU. > > Some SGX runtimes may want to use a different AEX target. To what end? Userspace gets no indication as to why the AEX occurred. And if exceptions are getting transfered to userspace the trampoline would effectively be handling only INTR, NMI, #MC and EPC #PF. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:4129 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726318AbeKCB7w (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 21:59:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:52:04 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: RFC: userspace exception fixups Message-ID: <20181102165204.GC7393@linux.intel.com> References: <20181101185225.GC5150@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20181101193107.GE5150@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20181102163034.GB7393@linux.intel.com> <7e14ee0e-ce15-1e88-7ae9-4d0f40cb3d84@fortanix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e14ee0e-ce15-1e88-7ae9-4d0f40cb3d84@fortanix.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jethro Beekman Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Rich Felker , Jann Horn , Dave Hansen , Jarkko Sakkinen , Florian Weimer , Linux API , X86 ML , linux-arch , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , "nhorman@redhat.com" , "npmccallum@redhat.com" , "Ayoun, Serge" , "shay.katz-zamir@intel.com" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Shevchenko , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Carlos O'Donell , "adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org" Message-ID: <20181102165204.LlLkI-2h3RRdDArepbUEOBxPttMoFaCImoIShfnErpg@z> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:37:10PM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote: > On 2018-11-02 09:30, Sean Christopherson wrote: > >... The intended convention for EENTER is to have an ENCLU at the AEX target ... > > > >... to further enforce that the AEX target needs to be ENCLU. > > Some SGX runtimes may want to use a different AEX target. To what end? Userspace gets no indication as to why the AEX occurred. And if exceptions are getting transfered to userspace the trampoline would effectively be handling only INTR, NMI, #MC and EPC #PF.