public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] asm-generic/ptrace.h: add a comment about frame_pointer
@ 2018-12-10 21:31 Dmitry V. Levin
  2018-12-10 21:31 ` Dmitry V. Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry V. Levin @ 2018-12-10 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Nesterov, Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-arch, linux-kernel

I have been misled by comments in asm-generic/ptrace.h into thinking
that frame_pointer() is universally available across architectures,
which resulted in a wrong design decision.

Add a comment about frame_pointer in a hope that it will help others
to avoid this mistake in the future.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/ptrace.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h b/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
index 82e674f6b337..3186c30bd50d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ static inline void user_stack_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
 #define SET_FP(regs, val) (GET_FP(regs) = (val))
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Unlike instruction_pointer and user_stack_pointer,
+ * frame_pointer is not universally available across architectures.
+ */
 static inline unsigned long frame_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	return GET_FP(regs);
-- 
ldv

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] asm-generic/ptrace.h: add a comment about frame_pointer
  2018-12-10 21:31 [PATCH] asm-generic/ptrace.h: add a comment about frame_pointer Dmitry V. Levin
@ 2018-12-10 21:31 ` Dmitry V. Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry V. Levin @ 2018-12-10 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Nesterov, Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-arch, linux-kernel

I have been misled by comments in asm-generic/ptrace.h into thinking
that frame_pointer() is universally available across architectures,
which resulted in a wrong design decision.

Add a comment about frame_pointer in a hope that it will help others
to avoid this mistake in the future.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/ptrace.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h b/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
index 82e674f6b337..3186c30bd50d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ static inline void user_stack_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
 #define SET_FP(regs, val) (GET_FP(regs) = (val))
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Unlike instruction_pointer and user_stack_pointer,
+ * frame_pointer is not universally available across architectures.
+ */
 static inline unsigned long frame_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	return GET_FP(regs);
-- 
ldv

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-10 21:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-10 21:31 [PATCH] asm-generic/ptrace.h: add a comment about frame_pointer Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-10 21:31 ` Dmitry V. Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox