From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC LKMM 7/7] tools/memory-model: Dynamically check SRCU lock-to-unlock matching
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:41:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190110094131.GA11647@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109210748.29074-7-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Luc Maranget <Luc.Maranget@inria.fr>
>
> This commit checks that the return value of srcu_read_lock() is passed
> to the matching srcu_read_unlock(), where "matching" is determined by
> nesting. This check operates as follows:
>
> 1. srcu_read_lock() creates an integer token, which is stored into
> the generated events.
> 2. srcu_read_unlock() records its second (token) argument into the
> generated event.
> 3. A new herd primitive 'different-values' filters out pairs of events
> with identical values from the relation passed as its argument.
> 4. The bell file applies the above primitive to the (srcu)
> read-side-critical-section relation 'srcu-rscs' and flags non-empty
> results.
>
> BEWARE: Works only with herd version 7.51+6 and onwards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luc Maranget <Luc.Maranget@inria.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> [ paulmck: Apply Andrea Parri's off-list feedback. ]
> ---
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 3 +++
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat | 2 ++
> tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
> index 9c42cd9ddcb4..def9131d3d8e 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
> @@ -73,3 +73,6 @@ flag ~empty Srcu-unlock \ range(srcu-rscs) as unbalanced-srcu-locking
>
> (* Check for use of synchronize_srcu() inside an RCU critical section *)
> flag ~empty rcu-rscs & (po ; [Sync-srcu] ; po) as invalid-sleep
> +
> +(* Validate SRCU dynamic match *)
> +flag ~empty different-values(srcu-rscs) as srcu-bad-nesting
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
> index 8dcb37835b61..95bf45f1215f 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> (*
> + * Requires herd version 7.51+6 or higher.
I'm not all that exited about spreading version requirements in the
source: we report this requirement in our README, and apparently we
already struggle to keep this information up-to-date. So what about
squashing something like the below (assume that 7.52 will be released
by the time this patch hit mainline; if this won't be the case, we
may consider using the development version 7.51+6)? notice that this
also removes an (obsolete, at this point) comment from lock.cat.
Andrea
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/README b/tools/memory-model/README
index 9d7d4f23503fd..b362a41358fa1 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/README
+++ b/tools/memory-model/README
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ that litmus test to be exercised within the Linux kernel.
REQUIREMENTS
============
-Version 7.49 of the "herd7" and "klitmus7" tools must be downloaded
-separately:
+Version 7.52 or higher of the "herd7" and "klitmus7" tools must be
+downloaded separately:
https://github.com/herd/herdtools7
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
index 95bf45f1215fc..8dcb37835b613 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
(*
- * Requires herd version 7.51+6 or higher.
- *
* Copyright (C) 2015 Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
* Copyright (C) 2016 Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> for Inria
* Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
index 305ded17e7411..a059d1a6d8a29 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
+++ b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
@@ -6,9 +6,6 @@
(*
* Generate coherence orders and handle lock operations
- *
- * Warning: spin_is_locked() crashes herd7 versions strictly before 7.48.
- * spin_is_locked() is functional from herd7 version 7.49.
*)
include "cross.cat"
> + *
> * Copyright (C) 2015 Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
> * Copyright (C) 2016 Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> for Inria
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
> index 1d6a120cde14..0c3f0ef486f4 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ synchronize_rcu_expedited() { __fence{sync-rcu}; }
>
> // SRCU
> srcu_read_lock(X) __srcu{srcu-lock}(X)
> -srcu_read_unlock(X,Y) { __srcu{srcu-unlock}(X); }
> +srcu_read_unlock(X,Y) { __srcu{srcu-unlock}(X,Y); }
> synchronize_srcu(X) { __srcu{sync-srcu}(X); }
>
> // Atomic
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-10 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 21:07 [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/6] LKMM updates Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] tools/memory-model: Rename some RCU relations Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 2/7] tools/memory-model: Refactor " Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 3/7] tools/memory-model: Add SRCU support Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 4/7] tools/memory-model: Update README for addition of SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Enforce heavy ordering for port I/O accesses Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-11 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 15:30 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 15:30 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 17:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-11 17:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-11 17:32 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 17:32 ` Will Deacon
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 6/7] tools/memory-model: Update Documentation/explanation.txt to include SRCU support Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 7/7] tools/memory-model: Dynamically check SRCU lock-to-unlock matching Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 9:41 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2019-01-10 9:41 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 14:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 14:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 23:20 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 23:20 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-11 21:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-11 21:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-11 21:57 ` Alan Stern
2019-01-11 21:57 ` Alan Stern
2019-01-09 23:18 ` [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/6] LKMM updates Andrea Parri
2019-01-09 23:18 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-09 23:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 23:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 0:39 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 0:39 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 8:40 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 8:40 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 14:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 14:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2019-01-10 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2019-01-10 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 22:46 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 22:46 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 15:47 ` Alan Stern
2019-01-10 15:47 ` Alan Stern
2019-01-10 19:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 19:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190110094131.GA11647@andrea \
--to=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox