public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:31:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213193127.GH4240@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D4FF0DE@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:43:41PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > I think the last time this came up, it was said that those people still
> > running Linux on Itanium were running old distro kernels, not upstream.
> >
> > So yeah, we could probably do whatever and nobody would ever notice,
> > except maybe Al, who is rumoured to still have an ia64 :-)
> 
> I haven't heard of anyone taking upstream kernels and actually using them
> for production work in a long time. It's mostly just a few folks keeping ia64
> alive "just because" these days.  I doubt any of them have an SGI Altix
> to test on (so realistically Altix was probably broken upstream many releases
> ago).

That would require a well-healed computer collector, wouldn't it?  Just to
run the thing.  ;-)

								Thanx, Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-13 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-11 17:29 [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section Will Deacon
2019-02-11 17:29 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-11 20:22   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-12 18:43   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-12 18:43     ` Will Deacon
2019-02-12 19:24     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-12 19:24       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-11 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-11 22:34   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-12  4:01   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-02-12  4:01     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-02-13 17:20   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-13 17:20     ` Will Deacon
2019-02-13 18:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-13 18:27       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-13 18:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-13 18:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-13 18:43         ` Luck, Tony
2019-02-13 18:43           ` Luck, Tony
2019-02-13 19:31           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-02-13 19:31             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-18 16:50       ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 16:50         ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 16:13         ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 16:13           ` Will Deacon
2019-02-21  6:22           ` Michael Ellerman
2019-02-21  6:22             ` Michael Ellerman
2019-02-22 17:38             ` Will Deacon
2019-02-22 17:38               ` Will Deacon
2019-02-12 13:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-12 13:03   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 16:29   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 16:29     ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 16:59     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 16:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 17:56       ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 17:56         ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 20:37         ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-18 20:37           ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 10:27           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-02-19 10:27             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-02-19 11:31             ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 11:31               ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 11:36               ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 11:36                 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 13:01                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 13:01                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 13:20                   ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 13:20                     ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 13:45                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 13:45                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-19 11:34             ` Will Deacon
2019-02-19 11:34               ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190213193127.GH4240@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox