From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 20:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Kuo , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will > just create conflicts with my series.. I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both series as a single set. Preferences? -- Sincerely yours, Mike. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:45134 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728670AbfBNSjJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:39:09 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1EId4DH056035 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:39:08 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qncg0nc7y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:39:07 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:39:05 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 20:38:55 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> Message-ID: <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20190214183855.83beBqWTxwIQJc7KtZ2K6-kGtoVqVFSgHxokM11Q0hI@z> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will > just create conflicts with my series.. I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both series as a single set. Preferences? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.