From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:49:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20190218094948.GA5892@lst.de> References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will > > just create conflicts with my series.. > > I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both > series as a single set. > Preferences? So far there wasn't really much a reason to rebase my series, hope this gets picked up either by Andrew or Al (not sure what the right place is). I think for now just rebase your series on top, we can then figure out how to proceed. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43927 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727423AbfBRJtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 04:49:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:49:48 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation Message-ID: <20190218094948.GA5892@lst.de> References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20190218094948.2ZqH5zB1jIRvMYEx_gty5wdXKmpYplhV9E-fC-XwR-w@z> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will > > just create conflicts with my series.. > > I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both > series as a single set. > Preferences? So far there wasn't really much a reason to rebase my series, hope this gets picked up either by Andrew or Al (not sure what the right place is). I think for now just rebase your series on top, we can then figure out how to proceed.