public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
	Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
	Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:45:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226104551.GF32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226093009.GS32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:30:09AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 09:55:17AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > But if you know of any code in the Linux kernel that needs to compare
> > pointers, one of which might be in the process of being freed, please
> > do point me at it.
> 
> I'm having the utmost difficulty of understanding why that would be a
> problem. It's just a value. Freeing memory does not affect the actual
> memory or any pointers to it.
> 
> *confusion*
> 
> None of this makes any kind of sense.

I found and started to read:

  www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2311.pdf

and that's all massive bong-hits. That's utterly insane.

Even the proposed semantics are crazy; they include UB and are therefore
broken on principle. But also; the provenance ID has words like:
"allocated storage duration", how is that well defined in the context of
concurrent execution?

Also, isn't the kernel filled with inter-object pointer arithmetic?

PNVI also looks like something that simply cannot work; how are we at
compile time supposed to know the active (concurrent modified) heap
layout. What is a 'live' object?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-26 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-19 22:57 [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo Andrea Parri
2019-02-19 22:57 ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-20  2:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-20  2:01   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-20  9:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20  9:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20  9:57     ` Will Deacon
2019-02-20  9:57       ` Will Deacon
2019-02-20 13:17       ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-20 13:17         ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-20 13:14     ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-20 13:14       ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-20 13:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 13:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-22 11:21         ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-22 11:21           ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-22 13:00           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-22 13:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 17:55             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-25 17:55               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26  9:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26  9:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26  9:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26  9:30                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 10:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-26 10:45                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:21                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:21                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:25                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:25                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:30                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:30                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 11:38                         ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-26 11:38                           ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-26 13:49                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 13:49                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 14:28                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26 14:28                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26 14:47                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 14:47                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 15:39                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26 15:39                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26 14:56                               ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-02-26 14:56                                 ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-02-26 15:04                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26 15:04                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-26 15:09                                   ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-02-26 15:09                                     ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-02-26 15:04                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-26 15:04                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-06 15:46                                 ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-03-06 15:46                                   ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-03-06 16:58                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-06 16:58                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-06 17:26                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-06 17:26                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-06 17:24                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-06 17:24                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-02 15:27                             ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-03-02 15:27                               ` Akira Yokosawa
2019-03-04 16:09                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-04 16:09                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-20 13:41       ` Will Deacon
2019-02-20 13:41         ` Will Deacon
2019-02-20 15:30         ` Alan Stern
2019-02-20 15:30           ` Alan Stern
2019-02-20 15:22 ` Alan Stern
2019-02-20 15:22   ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190226104551.GF32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox