From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL where it has no effect Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:19:21 +0300 Message-ID: <20190516051921.GC21366@rapoport-lnx> References: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Andrew, Can this go via the -mm tree? On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:56:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi, > > For several architectures the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL has no real effect > because the dependencies for the memory model are always evaluated to a > single value. > > Remove the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL from the Kconfigs for these > architectures. > > Mike Rapoport (3): > arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > s390: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > sparc: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 --- > arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 --- > arch/sparc/Kconfig | 3 --- > 3 files changed, 9 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38010 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726277AbfEPFTd (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 01:19:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4G5HWaR121164 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:19:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sgxr5wwhf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:19:31 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:19:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:19:21 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL where it has no effect References: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20190516051921.GC21366@rapoport-lnx> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20190516051921.UUO9zfa4MurQ3a3Ru27JoRQs1qdnPcHzB2c3-UdA8J0@z> Andrew, Can this go via the -mm tree? On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:56:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi, > > For several architectures the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL has no real effect > because the dependencies for the memory model are always evaluated to a > single value. > > Remove the ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL from the Kconfigs for these > architectures. > > Mike Rapoport (3): > arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > s390: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > sparc: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 --- > arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 --- > arch/sparc/Kconfig | 3 --- > 3 files changed, 9 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.