public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, dave.dice@oracle.com,
	x86@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rahul Yadav <rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:40:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605204003.GC3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0BC44A5-875C-4BED-A616-D380F6CF25D5@oracle.com>

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 07:21:13PM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote:

> Trying to resume this work, I am looking for concrete steps required
> to integrate CNA with the paravirt patching.
> 
> Looking at alternative_instructions(), I wonder if I need to add
> another call, something like apply_numa() similar to apply_paravirt(),
> and do the patch work there.  Or perhaps I should “just" initialize
> the pv_ops structure with the corresponding
> numa_queued_spinlock_slowpath() in paravirt.c?

Yeah, just initialize the pv_ops.lock.* thingies to contain the numa
variant before apply_paravirt() happens.

> Also, the paravirt code is under arch/x86, while CNA is generic (not
> x86-specific).  Do you still want to see CNA-related patching residing
> under arch/x86?
> 
> We still need a config option (something like NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS) to
> enable CNA patching under this config only, correct?

There is the static_call() stuff that could be generic; I posted a new
version of that today (x86 only for now, but IIRC there's arm64 patches
for that around somewhere too).

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190605130753.327195108@infradead.org

Which would allow something a little like this:


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index bd5ac6cc37db..01feaf912bd7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -63,29 +63,7 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
-
 void native_pv_lock_init(void) __init;
-
-#define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
-static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
-	if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
-		return false;
-
-	/*
-	 * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
-	 * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
-	 * horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
-	 */
-
-	do {
-		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
-			cpu_relax();
-	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
-
-	return true;
-}
 #else
 static inline void native_pv_lock_init(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 5169b8cc35bb..78be9e474e94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 {
 	native_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);
 	if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME))
-		static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+		static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 }
 
 static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index 98039d7fb998..ae6d15f84867 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -105,12 +105,10 @@ static unsigned paravirt_patch_jmp(void *insn_buff, const void *target,
 }
 #endif
 
-DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
-
 void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
 {
-	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
-		static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+		static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __tas_spin_lock_slowpath);
 }
 
 unsigned paravirt_patch_default(u8 type, void *insn_buff,
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 3776122c87cc..86808127b6e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
 
 	if (!xen_pvspin) {
 		if (cpu == 0)
-			static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+			static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 		return;
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
index fde943d180e0..8ca4dd9db931 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
@@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ static __always_inline int queued_spin_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 	return likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL));
 }
 
-extern void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
+extern void __queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
+
+DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 
 /**
  * queued_spin_lock - acquire a queued spinlock
@@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 	if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)))
 		return;
 
-	queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock, val);
+	static_call(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, lock, val);
 }
 
 #ifndef queued_spin_unlock
@@ -95,13 +97,6 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifndef virt_spin_lock
-static __always_inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
-	return false;
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
  * queued spinlock functions.
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 2473f10c6956..0e9e61637d56 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -290,6 +290,20 @@ static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
 
 #endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
 
+void __tas_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+	/*
+	 * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
+	 * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
+	 * horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
+	 */
+
+	do {
+		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
+			cpu_relax();
+	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
+}
+
 /**
  * queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock
  * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
@@ -311,7 +325,7 @@ static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
  * contended             :    (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -'  :
  *   queue               :         ^--'                             :
  */
-void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+void __queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 {
 	struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
 	u32 old, tail;
@@ -322,9 +336,6 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	if (pv_enabled())
 		goto pv_queue;
 
-	if (virt_spin_lock(lock))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded
 	 * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress.
@@ -558,7 +569,9 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 
 /*
  * Generate the paravirt code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath().

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@oracle.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	dave.dice@oracle.com, Rahul Yadav <rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:40:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605204003.GC3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190605204003.I1t_aHJizBGWeUpgXo7wcOJyiYDs-CrWO4jgbwDZ3Ww@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0BC44A5-875C-4BED-A616-D380F6CF25D5@oracle.com>

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 07:21:13PM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote:

> Trying to resume this work, I am looking for concrete steps required
> to integrate CNA with the paravirt patching.
> 
> Looking at alternative_instructions(), I wonder if I need to add
> another call, something like apply_numa() similar to apply_paravirt(),
> and do the patch work there.  Or perhaps I should “just" initialize
> the pv_ops structure with the corresponding
> numa_queued_spinlock_slowpath() in paravirt.c?

Yeah, just initialize the pv_ops.lock.* thingies to contain the numa
variant before apply_paravirt() happens.

> Also, the paravirt code is under arch/x86, while CNA is generic (not
> x86-specific).  Do you still want to see CNA-related patching residing
> under arch/x86?
> 
> We still need a config option (something like NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS) to
> enable CNA patching under this config only, correct?

There is the static_call() stuff that could be generic; I posted a new
version of that today (x86 only for now, but IIRC there's arm64 patches
for that around somewhere too).

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190605130753.327195108@infradead.org

Which would allow something a little like this:


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index bd5ac6cc37db..01feaf912bd7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -63,29 +63,7 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
-
 void native_pv_lock_init(void) __init;
-
-#define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
-static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
-	if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
-		return false;
-
-	/*
-	 * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
-	 * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
-	 * horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
-	 */
-
-	do {
-		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
-			cpu_relax();
-	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
-
-	return true;
-}
 #else
 static inline void native_pv_lock_init(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 5169b8cc35bb..78be9e474e94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 {
 	native_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);
 	if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME))
-		static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+		static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 }
 
 static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index 98039d7fb998..ae6d15f84867 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -105,12 +105,10 @@ static unsigned paravirt_patch_jmp(void *insn_buff, const void *target,
 }
 #endif
 
-DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
-
 void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
 {
-	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
-		static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+		static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __tas_spin_lock_slowpath);
 }
 
 unsigned paravirt_patch_default(u8 type, void *insn_buff,
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 3776122c87cc..86808127b6e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
 
 	if (!xen_pvspin) {
 		if (cpu == 0)
-			static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+			static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 		return;
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
index fde943d180e0..8ca4dd9db931 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
@@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ static __always_inline int queued_spin_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 	return likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL));
 }
 
-extern void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
+extern void __queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
+
+DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 
 /**
  * queued_spin_lock - acquire a queued spinlock
@@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 	if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)))
 		return;
 
-	queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock, val);
+	static_call(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, lock, val);
 }
 
 #ifndef queued_spin_unlock
@@ -95,13 +97,6 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifndef virt_spin_lock
-static __always_inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
-{
-	return false;
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
  * queued spinlock functions.
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 2473f10c6956..0e9e61637d56 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -290,6 +290,20 @@ static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
 
 #endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
 
+void __tas_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+	/*
+	 * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
+	 * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
+	 * horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
+	 */
+
+	do {
+		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
+			cpu_relax();
+	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
+}
+
 /**
  * queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock
  * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
@@ -311,7 +325,7 @@ static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
  * contended             :    (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -'  :
  *   queue               :         ^--'                             :
  */
-void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+void __queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 {
 	struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
 	u32 old, tail;
@@ -322,9 +336,6 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	if (pv_enabled())
 		goto pv_queue;
 
-	if (virt_spin_lock(lock))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded
 	 * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress.
@@ -558,7 +569,9 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 
 /*
  * Generate the paravirt code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath().

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-29 15:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] locking/qspinlock: Make arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended more generic Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20   ` Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] locking/qspinlock: Refactor the qspinlock slow path Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20   ` Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20   ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-01  9:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:53       ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 15:53         ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 16:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 16:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01 14:36   ` Waiman Long
2019-04-01 14:36     ` Waiman Long
2019-04-02  9:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-02  9:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:39       ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 15:39         ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 15:48         ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 15:48           ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 16:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04  5:05           ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-04  5:05             ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-04  9:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04  9:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04 18:03               ` Waiman Long
2019-04-04 18:03                 ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 23:21           ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-04 23:21             ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-05 20:40             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-05 20:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-06 15:21               ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-06 15:21                 ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-06 15:32                 ` Waiman Long
2019-06-06 15:32                   ` Waiman Long
2019-06-06 15:42                   ` Waiman Long
2019-06-06 15:42                     ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:33       ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:33         ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 17:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:16           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:40           ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 17:40             ` Waiman Long
2019-04-04  2:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2019-04-04  2:02     ` Hanjun Guo
2019-04-04  3:14     ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-04  3:14       ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-11  4:22   ` liwei (GF)
2019-06-11  4:22     ` liwei (GF)
2019-06-12  4:38     ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-12  4:38       ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-12 15:05       ` Waiman Long
2019-06-12 15:05         ` Waiman Long
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce starvation avoidance into CNA Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20   ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-02 10:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-02 10:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:06     ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 17:06       ` Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce the shuffle reduction optimization " Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20   ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-01  9:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:13   ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 17:13     ` Alex Kogan
2019-07-03 11:58 ` Jan Glauber
2019-07-03 11:58   ` Jan Glauber
2019-07-12  8:12   ` Hanjun Guo
2019-07-12  8:12     ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190605204003.GC3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=alex.kogan@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.dice@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox