From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5]: Removing saved_sigmask Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20190611185857.GB31214@redhat.com> References: <20190522032144.10995-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <20190529161157.GA27659@redhat.com> <20190604134117.GA29963@redhat.com> <20190606140814.GA13440@redhat.com> <87k1dxaxcl.fsf_-_@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k1dxaxcl.fsf_-_@xmission.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , Deepa Dinamani , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, dbueso@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, dave@stgolabs.net, e@80x24.org, jbaron@akamai.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, omar.kilani@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, stable@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , David Laight , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 06/07, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Eric W. Biederman (5): > signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask > signal/kvm: Stop using sigprocmask in kvm_sigset_(activate|deactivate) > signal: Always keep real_blocked in sync with blocked > signal: Remove saved_sigmask > signal: Remove the unnecessary restore_sigmask flag Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov I guess this should be routed via -mm tree? This depends on signal-simplify-set_user_sigmask-restore_user_sigmask.patch Oleg. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53186 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388630AbfFKS7I (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:59:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:58:58 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5]: Removing saved_sigmask Message-ID: <20190611185857.GB31214@redhat.com> References: <20190522032144.10995-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <20190529161157.GA27659@redhat.com> <20190604134117.GA29963@redhat.com> <20190606140814.GA13440@redhat.com> <87k1dxaxcl.fsf_-_@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k1dxaxcl.fsf_-_@xmission.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , Deepa Dinamani , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, dbueso@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, dave@stgolabs.net, e@80x24.org, jbaron@akamai.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, omar.kilani@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, stable@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , David Laight , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20190611185858.ay-79R1uySB64nk_QbwsXpIGCWU4-_bRl3D60WFLLNM@z> On 06/07, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Eric W. Biederman (5): > signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask > signal/kvm: Stop using sigprocmask in kvm_sigset_(activate|deactivate) > signal: Always keep real_blocked in sync with blocked > signal: Remove saved_sigmask > signal: Remove the unnecessary restore_sigmask flag Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov I guess this should be routed via -mm tree? This depends on signal-simplify-set_user_sigmask-restore_user_sigmask.patch Oleg.