From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142454.GD33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-13-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:40PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
>
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index d69c1ef..33957a12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -452,8 +452,10 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> {
> if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> - else
> + else {
> *vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
> + }
Style nit: both sides of an if-else should match brace-wise. i.e. please
add braces to the other side.
As with the prior patch, the u64 cast can also go.
Otherwise, this looks right to me.
Thanks,
Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142454.GD33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191011142455.ypW3n74Zvk9TZpXDZLwdjp44lYIXIECgqDeE07b-qy8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-13-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:40PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
>
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index d69c1ef..33957a12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -452,8 +452,10 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> {
> if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> - else
> + else {
> *vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
> + }
Style nit: both sides of an if-else should match brace-wise. i.e. please
add braces to the other side.
As with the prior patch, the u64 cast can also go.
Otherwise, this looks right to me.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 18:44 [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mm: Reserve asm-generic prot flag 0x10 for arch use Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] arm64: docs: cpu-feature-registers: Document ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 13:19 ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 13:19 ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 14:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:51 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-21 19:18 ` Mark Brown
2019-10-21 19:18 ` Mark Brown
2019-10-22 10:32 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-22 10:32 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` [FIXUP 0/2] Fixups to patch 5 Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` [FIXUP 1/2] squash! arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` [FIXUP 2/2] " Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] " Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:10 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:25 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:25 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:40 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:40 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:36 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:36 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:37 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:37 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:40 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:40 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:31 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:31 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] arm64: traps: Fix inconsistent faulting instruction skipping Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 15:21 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 15:21 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:49 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:49 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-22 11:09 ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-22 11:09 ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:47 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:47 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 14:49 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 14:49 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: " Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:24 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-10-11 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:44 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011142454.GD33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sudi.das@arm.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox