public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
	"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:24:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142454.GD33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-13-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:40PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
> 
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index d69c1ef..33957a12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -452,8 +452,10 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
>  {
>  	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
>  		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> -	else
> +	else {
>  		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> +		*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
> +	}

Style nit: both sides of an if-else should match brace-wise. i.e. please
add braces to the other side.

As with the prior patch, the u64 cast can also go.

Otherwise, this looks right to me.

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
	"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:24:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142454.GD33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191011142455.ypW3n74Zvk9TZpXDZLwdjp44lYIXIECgqDeE07b-qy8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-13-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:40PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
> 
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index d69c1ef..33957a12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -452,8 +452,10 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
>  {
>  	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
>  		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> -	else
> +	else {
>  		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> +		*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
> +	}

Style nit: both sides of an if-else should match brace-wise. i.e. please
add braces to the other side.

As with the prior patch, the u64 cast can also go.

Otherwise, this looks right to me.

Thanks,
Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-10 18:44 [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mm: Reserve asm-generic prot flag 0x10 for arch use Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] arm64: docs: cpu-feature-registers: Document ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 13:19   ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 13:19     ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 14:51     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:51       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-21 19:18       ` Mark Brown
2019-10-21 19:18         ` Mark Brown
2019-10-22 10:32         ` Will Deacon
2019-10-22 10:32           ` Will Deacon
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06   ` [FIXUP 0/2] Fixups to patch 5 Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` [FIXUP 1/2] squash! arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` [FIXUP 2/2] " Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:10   ` [PATCH v2 05/12] " Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:10     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:25     ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:25       ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:32       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:32         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:40         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:40           ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:44           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:44             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01               ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42               ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42                 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:05                 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:05                   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:36                   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:36                     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:10       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:10         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:37         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:37           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:16       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:16         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:40         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:40           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:31   ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:31     ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:33     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:33       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] arm64: traps: Fix inconsistent faulting instruction skipping Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:24   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 15:21     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 15:21       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:42       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:42         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:49         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:49           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-22 11:09             ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-22 11:09               ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:21   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:21     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:47     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:47       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:04       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:04         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 14:49         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 14:49           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: " Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:24   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-10-11 14:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:44     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:44       ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191011142454.GD33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sudi.das@arm.com \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox