From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note" Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20191015165412.GD596@zn.tnic> References: <20191011000609.29728-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20191011000609.29728-2-keescook@chromium.org> <20191011082519.GI9749@gate.crashing.org> <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook> <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Kees Cook , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Dave Hansen , Heiko Carstens , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Edgecombe , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:25:52AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with > a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you? So if we agree on the name "notes" and we decide to rename the other arches, this should all be done in a separate patchset anyway, and ontop of this one. And I believe Kees wouldn't mind doing it ontop since he's gotten his hands dirty already. :-P Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:56338 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726362AbfJOQy0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:54:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:54:13 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note" Message-ID: <20191015165412.GD596@zn.tnic> References: <20191011000609.29728-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20191011000609.29728-2-keescook@chromium.org> <20191011082519.GI9749@gate.crashing.org> <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook> <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Kees Cook , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Dave Hansen , Heiko Carstens , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Edgecombe , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Message-ID: <20191015165413.LRK1PSmtlAQa4CYAcdVXh-T9_3FDdxUWhL-pHvAS1tU@z> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:25:52AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with > a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you? So if we agree on the name "notes" and we decide to rename the other arches, this should all be done in a separate patchset anyway, and ontop of this one. And I believe Kees wouldn't mind doing it ontop since he's gotten his hands dirty already. :-P Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette