From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:23:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20191031212313.GH16197@mit.edu> References: <20191031010736.113783-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191031010736.113783-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Valdis Kletnieks Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , "Darrick J. Wong" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chao Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Gao Xiang , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and > (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:43116 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726680AbfJaVXv (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:23:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:23:13 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody Message-ID: <20191031212313.GH16197@mit.edu> References: <20191031010736.113783-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191031010736.113783-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Valdis Kletnieks Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gao Xiang , Chao Yu , Andreas Dilger , Jaegeuk Kim , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Arnd Bergmann , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20191031212313.3yGVPJpv1aUZjPrk1WVk6Vasz4Cftc5Ea-_dVldiZy8@z> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one > patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and > (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o