From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] asm-generic: ioremap_uc should behave the same with and without MMU Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:29:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de> References: <20191029064834.23438-1-hch@lst.de> <20191029064834.23438-11-hch@lst.de> <20191111101531.GA12294@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Guo Ren , Michal Simek , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guan Xuetao , the arch/x86 maintainers , alpha , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" , Linux ARM , "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:NIOS2 ARCHITECTURE" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Parisc List , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.orgli List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Ok, fair enough. Let's just go with your version for now, if only to not > hold your series up more. I'd still suggest we change atyfb to only > use ioremap_uc() on i386 and maybe ia64. I can send a patch for that. I don't think we even need it on ia64. But lets kick off a dicussion with the atyfb, x86 and ia64 maintainers after this series is in. Which was kinda my plan anyway. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48604 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726952AbfKKK32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:29:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:29:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] asm-generic: ioremap_uc should behave the same with and without MMU Message-ID: <20191111102923.GA12974@lst.de> References: <20191029064834.23438-1-hch@lst.de> <20191029064834.23438-11-hch@lst.de> <20191111101531.GA12294@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Guo Ren , Michal Simek , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guan Xuetao , the arch/x86 maintainers , alpha , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" , Linux ARM , "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:NIOS2 ARCHITECTURE" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Parisc List , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mtd , linux-arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <20191111102923.ZpOKlO9YWlIztr6xvC7QuigMOONoEBegcl_hPgMqfXg@z> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Ok, fair enough. Let's just go with your version for now, if only to not > hold your series up more. I'd still suggest we change atyfb to only > use ioremap_uc() on i386 and maybe ia64. I can send a patch for that. I don't think we even need it on ia64. But lets kick off a dicussion with the atyfb, x86 and ia64 maintainers after this series is in. Which was kinda my plan anyway.