From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:05:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Mark Brown , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is a resend of a series from Richard Henderson last posted back in > > November: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191106141308.30535-1-rth@twiddle.net/ > > > > Back then Borislav said they looked good and asked if he should take > > them through the tip tree but things seem to have got lost since then. > > Or, alternatively, akpm could take them. In any case, if someone else > ends up doing that, for the x86 bits: > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov Or I can take them through the random.git tree, since we have a lot of changes this cycle going to Linus anyway. Any objections? - Ted From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:56710 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726066AbgAJRGm (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:06:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:05:59 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Message-ID: <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Mark Brown , Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20200110170559.FDl1G15hoeIyPXFr0IsqS3IryYV6cCgSWFLV1kcuo3U@z> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is a resend of a series from Richard Henderson last posted back in > > November: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191106141308.30535-1-rth@twiddle.net/ > > > > Back then Borislav said they looked good and asked if he should take > > them through the tip tree but things seem to have got lost since then. > > Or, alternatively, akpm could take them. In any case, if someone else > ends up doing that, for the x86 bits: > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov Or I can take them through the random.git tree, since we have a lot of changes this cycle going to Linus anyway. Any objections? - Ted