From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:46:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20200125174633.GN1108497@mit.edu> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Mark Brown , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 06:59:01PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches. > > We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the > > patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody > > saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches > > are not applied. The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to > > take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible? > > Yes, Ted, pls pick them up so that we're done with this. I've picked them up and pushed them to the random tree. - Ted From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:57361 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726448AbgAYRrP (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:47:15 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:46:33 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Message-ID: <20200125174633.GN1108497@mit.edu> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Mark Brown , Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20200125174633.cYtEcMR5dxapfKpMqhDRmrvtYpLHLjS9CR6jxfu0fV0@z> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 06:59:01PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches. > > We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the > > patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody > > saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches > > are not applied. The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to > > take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible? > > Yes, Ted, pls pick them up so that we're done with this. I've picked them up and pushed them to the random tree. - Ted