Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu,tracing: Create trace_rcu_{enter,exit}()

Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13T21:19:33Z

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:54:42PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:44:44PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > It might well be that I could make these functions be NMI-safe, but
> > > > > rcu_prepare_for_idle() in particular would be a bit ugly at best.
> > > > > So, before looking into that, I have a question. Given these proposed
> > > > > changes, will rcu_nmi_exit_common() and rcu_nmi_enter_common() be able
> > > > > to just use in_nmi()?
> > > >
> > > > That _should_ already be the case today. That is, if we end up in a
> > > > tracer and in_nmi() is unreliable we're already screwed anyway.
> > >
> > > So something like this, then? This is untested, probably doesn't even
> > > build, and could use some careful review from both Peter and Steve,
> > > at least. As in the below is the second version of the patch, the first
> > > having been missing a couple of important "!" characters.
> >
> > I removed the static from rcu_nmi_enter()/exit() as it is called from
> > outside, that makes it build now. Updated below is Paul's diff. I also added
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() to rcu_nmi_exit() to match rcu_nmi_enter() since it seemed
> > asymmetric.
>
> My compiler complained about the static and the __always_inline, so I
> fixed those. But please help me out on adding the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()
> to rcu_nmi_exit(). What bad thing happens if we leave this on only
> rcu_nmi_enter()?

It seemed odd to me we were not allowing kprobe on the rcu_nmi_enter() but
allowing it on exit (from a code reading standpoint) so my reaction was to
add it to both, but we could probably keep that as a separate
patch/discussion since it is slightly unrelated to the patch.. Sorry to
confuse the topic.

thanks,

- Joel

> Thanx, Paul
>
> > ---8<-----------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index d91c9156fab2e..bbcc7767f18ee 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -614,16 +614,18 @@ void rcu_user_enter(void)
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> >
> > -/*
> > +/**
> > + * rcu_nmi_exit - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
> > + *
> > * If we are returning from the outermost NMI handler that interrupted an
> > * RCU-idle period, update rdp->dynticks and rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting
> > * to let the RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is back to
> > * being RCU-idle.
> > *
> > - * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit_common(), be sure to test
> > + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit(), be sure to test
> > * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
> > */
> > -static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit_common(bool irq)
> > +__always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
> > {
> > struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> >
> > @@ -651,25 +653,15 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit_common(bool irq)
> > trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Startirq"), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0, atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks));
> > WRITE_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0); /* Avoid store tearing. */
> >
> > - if (irq)
> > + if (!in_nmi())
> > rcu_prepare_for_idle();
> >
> > rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter();
> >
> > - if (irq)
> > + if (!in_nmi())
> > rcu_dynticks_task_enter();
> > }
> > -
> > -/**
> > - * rcu_nmi_exit - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
> > - *
> > - * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit(), be sure to test
> > - * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
> > - */
> > -void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
> > -{
> > - rcu_nmi_exit_common(false);
> > -}
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rcu_nmi_exit);
> >
> > /**
> > * rcu_irq_exit - inform RCU that current CPU is exiting irq towards idle
> > @@ -693,7 +685,7 @@ void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
> > void rcu_irq_exit(void)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > - rcu_nmi_exit_common(true);
> > + rcu_nmi_exit();
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -777,7 +769,7 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
> > #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> >
> > /**
> > - * rcu_nmi_enter_common - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
> > + * rcu_nmi_enter - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
> > * @irq: Is this call from rcu_irq_enter?
> > *
> > * If the CPU was idle from RCU's viewpoint, update rdp->dynticks and
> > @@ -786,10 +778,10 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
> > * long as the nesting level does not overflow an int. (You will probably
> > * run out of stack space first.)
> > *
> > - * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_enter_common(), be sure to test
> > + * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_enter(), be sure to test
> > * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
> > */
> > -static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
> > +__always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
> > {
> > long incby = 2;
> > struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> > @@ -807,12 +799,12 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
> > */
> > if (rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
> >
> > - if (irq)
> > + if (!in_nmi())
> > rcu_dynticks_task_exit();
> >
> > rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit();
> >
> > - if (irq)
> > + if (!in_nmi())
> > rcu_cleanup_after_idle();
> >
> > incby = 1;
> > @@ -834,14 +826,6 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
> > rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting + incby);
> > barrier();
> > }
> > -
> > -/**
> > - * rcu_nmi_enter - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
> > - */
> > -void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
> > -{
> > - rcu_nmi_enter_common(false);
> > -}
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rcu_nmi_enter);
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -869,7 +853,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rcu_nmi_enter);
> > void rcu_irq_enter(void)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > - rcu_nmi_enter_common(true);
> > + rcu_nmi_enter();
> > }
> >
> > /*