linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, gustavo@embeddedor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu,tracing: Create trace_rcu_{enter,exit}()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:44:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213204444.GA94647@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213185612.GG2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...] 
> > > It might well be that I could make these functions be NMI-safe, but
> > > rcu_prepare_for_idle() in particular would be a bit ugly at best.
> > > So, before looking into that, I have a question.  Given these proposed
> > > changes, will rcu_nmi_exit_common() and rcu_nmi_enter_common() be able
> > > to just use in_nmi()?
> > 
> > That _should_ already be the case today. That is, if we end up in a
> > tracer and in_nmi() is unreliable we're already screwed anyway.
> 
> So something like this, then?  This is untested, probably doesn't even
> build, and could use some careful review from both Peter and Steve,
> at least.  As in the below is the second version of the patch, the first
> having been missing a couple of important "!" characters.

I removed the static from rcu_nmi_enter()/exit() as it is called from
outside, that makes it build now. Updated below is Paul's diff. I also added
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() to rcu_nmi_exit() to match rcu_nmi_enter() since it seemed
asymmetric.

---8<-----------------------

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index d91c9156fab2e..bbcc7767f18ee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -614,16 +614,18 @@ void rcu_user_enter(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
 
-/*
+/**
+ * rcu_nmi_exit - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
+ *
  * If we are returning from the outermost NMI handler that interrupted an
  * RCU-idle period, update rdp->dynticks and rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting
  * to let the RCU grace-period handling know that the CPU is back to
  * being RCU-idle.
  *
- * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit_common(), be sure to test
+ * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit(), be sure to test
  * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
  */
-static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit_common(bool irq)
+__always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
 
@@ -651,25 +653,15 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit_common(bool irq)
 	trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Startirq"), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0, atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks));
 	WRITE_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0); /* Avoid store tearing. */
 
-	if (irq)
+	if (!in_nmi())
 		rcu_prepare_for_idle();
 
 	rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter();
 
-	if (irq)
+	if (!in_nmi())
 		rcu_dynticks_task_enter();
 }
-
-/**
- * rcu_nmi_exit - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
- *
- * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_exit(), be sure to test
- * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
- */
-void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
-{
-	rcu_nmi_exit_common(false);
-}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rcu_nmi_exit);
 
 /**
  * rcu_irq_exit - inform RCU that current CPU is exiting irq towards idle
@@ -693,7 +685,7 @@ void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
 void rcu_irq_exit(void)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
-	rcu_nmi_exit_common(true);
+	rcu_nmi_exit();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -777,7 +769,7 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
 #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
 
 /**
- * rcu_nmi_enter_common - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
+ * rcu_nmi_enter - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
  * @irq: Is this call from rcu_irq_enter?
  *
  * If the CPU was idle from RCU's viewpoint, update rdp->dynticks and
@@ -786,10 +778,10 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
  * long as the nesting level does not overflow an int.  (You will probably
  * run out of stack space first.)
  *
- * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_enter_common(), be sure to test
+ * If you add or remove a call to rcu_nmi_enter(), be sure to test
  * with CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
  */
-static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
+__always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
 {
 	long incby = 2;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
@@ -807,12 +799,12 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
 	 */
 	if (rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
 
-		if (irq)
+		if (!in_nmi())
 			rcu_dynticks_task_exit();
 
 		rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit();
 
-		if (irq)
+		if (!in_nmi())
 			rcu_cleanup_after_idle();
 
 		incby = 1;
@@ -834,14 +826,6 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
 		   rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting + incby);
 	barrier();
 }
-
-/**
- * rcu_nmi_enter - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
- */
-void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
-{
-	rcu_nmi_enter_common(false);
-}
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rcu_nmi_enter);
 
 /**
@@ -869,7 +853,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rcu_nmi_enter);
 void rcu_irq_enter(void)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
-	rcu_nmi_enter_common(true);
+	rcu_nmi_enter();
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-13 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-12 21:01 [PATCH v2 0/9] tracing vs rcu vs nmi Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] rcu: Rename rcu_irq_{enter,exit}_irqson() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 22:38   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-12 22:38     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] rcu: Mark rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs() inline Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 22:38   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13  1:41     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-13 14:25       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu,tracing: Create trace_rcu_{enter,exit}() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 23:20   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13  8:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 13:31       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13 13:51       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-13 16:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 18:56           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-13 20:44             ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-02-13 20:44               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13 20:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-13 21:19                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13 21:38                   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-13 21:38                     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-13 21:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-13 21:50                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-13 22:04                       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-13 22:39                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-14  6:19                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-02-15 14:59                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-15 14:59                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-17  8:55                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-02-17 16:31                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-18  4:33                                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-02-18 16:12                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-18 16:15                                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-18 16:35                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-18 17:46                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-18 17:46                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-18 20:18                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-19  2:45                                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-06 18:01                                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-06 18:01                                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-06 18:47                                             ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-06 18:47                                               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-06 19:11                                             ` Joel Fernandes
2020-03-07  1:58                                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-07  1:58                                                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-06  0:42                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-13 21:48                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-13 22:58                     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13 22:58                       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13 23:55                       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-18 19:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 19:58                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 20:17                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-18 20:40                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 21:39                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-19  9:57                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-19 12:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-12 23:27   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-12 23:27     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13  8:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 18:39       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] sched,rcu,tracing: Avoid tracing before in_nmi() is correct Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] x86,tracing: Add comments to do_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] perf,tracing: Prepare the perf-trace interface for RCU changes Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 23:28   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-13  8:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 18:38       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] tracing: Employ trace_rcu_{enter,exit}() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] tracing: Remove regular RCU context for _rcuidle tracepoints (again) Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] perf,tracing: Allow function tracing when !RCU Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-14  2:28   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-14  2:42     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-14  3:32       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-14  3:32         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-14 20:38   ` Kim Phillips
2020-02-14 22:48     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200213204444.GA94647@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).