From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/27] lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 23:01:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20200221220136.GA28251@lenoir> References: <20200221133416.777099322@infradead.org> <20200221134215.090538203@infradead.org> <20200221100855.2f9bec3a@gandalf.local.home> <20200221202511.GB14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49232 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728723AbgBUWBl (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:01:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200221202511.GB14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, gustavo@embeddedor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, mhiramat@kernel.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:25:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:08:55AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:34:17 +0100 > > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > > > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > > > @@ -379,13 +379,13 @@ void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struc > > > > > > void lockdep_off(void) > > > { > > > - current->lockdep_recursion++; > > > + current->lockdep_recursion += BIT(16); > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_off); > > > > > > void lockdep_on(void) > > > { > > > - current->lockdep_recursion--; > > > + current->lockdep_recursion -= BIT(16); > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_on); > > > > > > > > + > > > +static bool lockdep_nmi(void) > > > +{ > > > + if (current->lockdep_recursion & 0xFFFF) > > > > Nitpick, but the association with bit 16 and this mask really should be > > defined as a macro somewhere and not have hard coded numbers. > > Right, I suppose I can do something like: > > #define LOCKDEP_RECURSION_BITS 16 > #define LOCKDEP_OFF (1U << LOCKDEP_RECURSION_BITS) > #define LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK (LOCKDEP_OFF - 1) With that I'd say Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker