From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dma-direct: provide a arch_dma_clear_uncached hook Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:56:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20200224215657.GA12618@lst.de> References: <20200224194446.690816-1-hch@lst.de> <20200224194446.690816-5-hch@lst.de> <20200224215327.GB11565@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40500 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727421AbgBXV5B (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:57:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200224215327.GB11565@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ira Weiny Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:53:28PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > > + else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_CLEAR_UNCACHED)) > > + arch_dma_clear_uncached(cpu_addr, size); > > Isn't using arch_dma_clear_uncached() before patch 5 going to break > bisectability? Only if ARCH_HAS_DMA_CLEAR_UNCACHED is selected by anything, which only happens in patch 5.