From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix __percpu annotation in asm-generic Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 22:13:47 -0600 Message-ID: <20200324041347.GA186169@zx2c4.com> References: <20191126200619.63348-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> <20191127175350.GA52308@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20191127225432.ttwxm3hxtg5utfaz@ltop.local> <20191130000037.zsendu5pk7p75xqf@ltop.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com ([192.95.5.64]:58047 "EHLO frisell.zx2c4.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725784AbgCXEOC (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:14:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191130000037.zsendu5pk7p75xqf@ltop.local> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Luc Van Oostenryck Cc: Christopher Lameter , Dennis Zhou , Ben Dooks , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Nicholas Piggin , Arnd Bergmann On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 01:00:37AM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > Note: it would be much much nicer to do all these type generic > macros with '__auto_type' (only supported in GCC 4.9 IIUC > and supported in sparse but it shouldn't be very hard to do).. I'm curious to know if you know why we're not using __auto_type. Because we're stuck on gcc 4.6, or is there a more subtle reason? Jason