From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:28:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Mark Brown , Alexander Viro , Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Yu-cheng Yu , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Andrew Jones , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Thomas Gleixner , Florian Weimer , Sudakshina List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:29:54PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 04:50:42PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > This patch series implements support for ARMv8.5-A Branch Target > > > Identification (BTI), which is a control flow integrity protection > > > feature introduced as part of the ARMv8.5-A extensions. > > > > I've not resent this since the branch is still sitting in the arm64 tree > > but it's also not in -next at the minute - is there anything you're > > waiting for from my end here? > > It's up to Will whether he wants a new series posted. The for-next/bti > branch is complete AFAICT, only that normally we start queueing stuff > (and push to -next) around -rc3. I'm happy either way, but it would be nice to base other BTI patches on top of this branch. Mark -- is it easier for you to refresh the series against v5.7-rc3, or leave it like it is? Please just let me know either way. Thanks, Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59472 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726798AbgD1N2M (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:28:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:28:05 +0100 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Message-ID: <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Mark Brown , Alexander Viro , Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Yu-cheng Yu , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Andrew Jones , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Thomas Gleixner , Florian Weimer , Sudakshina Das , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20200428132805.THntfv-0iqZ3eat-3qAw7gVeSjMuo5UKmuBzJbjMPvU@z> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:29:54PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 04:50:42PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > This patch series implements support for ARMv8.5-A Branch Target > > > Identification (BTI), which is a control flow integrity protection > > > feature introduced as part of the ARMv8.5-A extensions. > > > > I've not resent this since the branch is still sitting in the arm64 tree > > but it's also not in -next at the minute - is there anything you're > > waiting for from my end here? > > It's up to Will whether he wants a new series posted. The for-next/bti > branch is complete AFAICT, only that normally we start queueing stuff > (and push to -next) around -rc3. I'm happy either way, but it would be nice to base other BTI patches on top of this branch. Mark -- is it easier for you to refresh the series against v5.7-rc3, or leave it like it is? Please just let me know either way. Thanks, Will