From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:01:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20200428160141.GD12697@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> <20200428151205.GH5677@sirena.org.uk> <20200428151815.GB12697@willie-the-truck> <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Alexander Viro , Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Yu-cheng Yu , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Andrew Jones , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Thomas Gleixner , Florian Weimer S List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:58:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > It's probably easier for me if you just use the existing branch, I've > > > already got a branch based on a merge down. > > > Okey doke, I'll funnel that in the direction of linux-next then. It does > > mean that any subsequent patches for 5.8 that depend on BTI will need to > > be based on this branch, so as long as you're ok with that then it's fine > > by me (since I won't be able to apply patches if they refer to changes > > introduced in the recent merge window). > > That's not a problem, that's what I've got already and if I try to send > everything based off -rc3 directly the series would get unmanagably > large. Actually unless you think it's a bad idea I think what I'll do > is go and send out a couple of the preparatory changes (the insn updates > and the last bit of annotation conversions) separately for that branch > while I finalize the revisions of the main BTI kernel bit, hopefully > that'll make the review a bit more approachable. Okey doke, sounds good to me. I'm queuing stuff atm, so as long you tell me what I need to apply things against then we should be good. Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56300 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728151AbgD1QBu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:01:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:01:43 +0100 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Message-ID: <20200428160141.GD12697@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> <20200428151205.GH5677@sirena.org.uk> <20200428151815.GB12697@willie-the-truck> <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Alexander Viro , Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Yu-cheng Yu , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Andrew Jones , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Thomas Gleixner , Florian Weimer , Sudakshina Das , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20200428160143.HeGGNQVrxNQgMjWd39DSG2fVc7bHvvVe7k-Azg5WniI@z> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:58:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > It's probably easier for me if you just use the existing branch, I've > > > already got a branch based on a merge down. > > > Okey doke, I'll funnel that in the direction of linux-next then. It does > > mean that any subsequent patches for 5.8 that depend on BTI will need to > > be based on this branch, so as long as you're ok with that then it's fine > > by me (since I won't be able to apply patches if they refer to changes > > introduced in the recent merge window). > > That's not a problem, that's what I've got already and if I try to send > everything based off -rc3 directly the series would get unmanagably > large. Actually unless you think it's a bad idea I think what I'll do > is go and send out a couple of the preparatory changes (the insn updates > and the last bit of annotation conversions) separately for that branch > while I finalize the revisions of the main BTI kernel bit, hopefully > that'll make the review a bit more approachable. Okey doke, sounds good to me. I'm queuing stuff atm, so as long you tell me what I need to apply things against then we should be good. Will