From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paulmck@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:52:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20200623005231.27712-10-paulmck@kernel.org> References: <20200623005152.GA27459@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200623005152.GA27459@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com, "Paul E . McKenney" List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org From: Akira Yokosawa The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below. Fix the name of litmus test. Acked-by: Andrea Parri Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt index 7fe8d7a..63c4adf 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock. Consider this example: - /* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */ + /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */ void CPU0(void) { spin_lock(&mylock); -- 2.9.5 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46624 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732386AbgFWAwf (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:52:35 -0400 From: paulmck@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:52:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20200623005231.27712-10-paulmck@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200623005152.GA27459@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200623005152.GA27459@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com, "Paul E . McKenney" Message-ID: <20200623005227.I11Qz8fGomxPe3IPpof1TlFCGNlmwIelned1JmCK240@z> From: Akira Yokosawa The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below. Fix the name of litmus test. Acked-by: Andrea Parri Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt index 7fe8d7a..63c4adf 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock. Consider this example: - /* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */ + /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */ void CPU0(void) { spin_lock(&mylock); -- 2.9.5