From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: clean up address limit helpers Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:09:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20200714070955.GB776@lst.de> References: <20200710135706.537715-1-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53012 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725306AbgGNHJ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 03:09:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Nick Hu , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Morton , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:25:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:57 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > in preparation for eventually phasing out direct use of set_fs(), this > > series removes the segment_eq() arch helper that is only used to > > implement or duplicate the uaccess_kernel() API, and then adds > > descriptive helpers to force the kernel address limit. > > Ack. All the patches looked like no-ops to me, but with better naming > and clarity. Is that a formal Acked-by?