From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:14:15 +0300 Message-ID: <20200806111415.GL163101@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200804095035.18778-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200804095035.18778-4-rppt@kernel.org> <20200806102757.7vobcaewdukr2xdl@box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200806102757.7vobcaewdukr2xdl@box> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Christopher Lameter , Idan Yaniv , Thomas Gleixner , Elena Reshetova , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Ingo Molnar , Michael Kerrisk , Arnd Bergmann , James Bottomley , Borislav Petkov , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Walmsley , Dan Williams linux-a List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 01:27:57PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:50:32PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > Introduce "memfd_secret" system call with the ability to create memory > > areas visible only in the context of the owning process and not mapped not > > only to other processes but in the kernel page tables as well. > > > > The user will create a file descriptor using the memfd_secret() system call > > where flags supplied as a parameter to this system call will define the > > desired protection mode for the memory associated with that file > > descriptor. Currently there are two protection modes: > > > > * exclusive - the memory area is unmapped from the kernel direct map and it > > is present only in the page tables of the owning mm. > > * uncached - the memory area is present only in the page tables of the > > owning mm and it is mapped there as uncached. > > I'm not sure why flag for exclusive mode is needed. It has to be default. > And if you want uncached on top of that set the flag. Makes sense. > What am I missing? > > -- > Kirill A. Shutemov -- Sincerely yours, Mike.