From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:21:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914152103.000062e3@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200912013441.9730-2-atish.patra@wdc.com>
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:37 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> ARM64 numa implementation is generic enough that RISC-V can reuse that
> implementation with very minor cosmetic changes. This will help both
> ARM64 and RISC-V in terms of maintanace and feature improvement
>
> Move the numa implementation code to common directory so that both ISAs
> can reuse this. This doesn't introduce any function changes for ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 45 +----------------
> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/base/Kconfig | 6 +++
> drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 0
> include/asm-generic/numa.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (100%)
> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 6d232837cbee..955a0cf75b16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -960,6 +960,7 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
> # Common NUMA Features
> config NUMA
> bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> + select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
> select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
> select OF_NUMA
> help
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> index 626ad01e83bf..8c8cf4297cc3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -3,49 +3,6 @@
> #define __ASM_NUMA_H
>
> #include <asm/topology.h>
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -
> -#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
> -
> -int __node_distance(int from, int to);
> -#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> -
> -extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> -
> -extern bool numa_off;
> -
> -/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> -extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> -void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> -const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> -#else
> -/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> -static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> -{
> - return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> -int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> -void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> -void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> -void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> -void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> -void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> -void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> -
> -#else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> -
> -static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> -static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> -
> -#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +#include <asm-generic/numa.h>
>
> #endif /* __ASM_NUMA_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> index d91030f0ffee..928c308b044b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ obj-y := dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE) += dump.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS) += ptdump_debugfs.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += numa.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL) += physaddr.o
> KASAN_SANITIZE_physaddr.o += n
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> index 8d7001712062..c5956c8845cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> @@ -210,4 +210,10 @@ config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
> appropriate scaling, sysfs interface for reading capacity values at
> runtime.
>
> +config GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
> + bool
> + help
> + Enable support for generic NUMA implementation. Currently, RISC-V
> + and ARM64 uses it.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
> index 157452080f3d..c3d02c644222 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += pinctrl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += devcoredump.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN) += platform-msi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA) += arch_numa.o
>
> obj-y += test/
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> rename to drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2718d5a6ff03
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +
> +#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
> +
> +int __node_distance(int from, int to);
> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
> +
> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> +
> +extern bool numa_off;
> +
> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> +const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
> +#else
> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> +{
> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> +void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> +void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> +void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> +static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-12 1:34 [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code Atish Patra
2020-09-14 14:21 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic Atish Patra
2020-09-14 14:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 19:32 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-15 8:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init Atish Patra
2020-09-12 2:10 ` Greentime Hu
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform Atish Patra
2020-09-14 8:04 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 19:33 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-18 19:18 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200914152103.000062e3@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).