From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B046C4727C for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D638A20702 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727903AbgI2SDn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:03:43 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41202 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727657AbgI2SDn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:03:43 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 21E3667373; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 20:03:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 20:03:39 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Arnd Bergmann , Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 Message-ID: <20200929180339.GA12546@lst.de> References: <20200928124928.GA5834@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:45:30AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs >>> >>> under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not >>> what you were looking for. >> >> Well, we'll want it in linux-next and then 5.10. Either a merge through >> the RISC-V maintainer, or as part of the base branch from Al would >> make sense to me. > > Sorry, I guess my question was really: does that branch have all the > dependencies necessary for the RISC-V stuff to actually work? IIRC this actual > patch set depended on some other one, and while I thinK I got everything I > don't want to pull in something broken. The riscv patchset depend only on the base.set_fs branch in Als tree.