linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com,
	will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
	luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH memory-model 8/8] tools/memory-model: Label MP tests' producers and consumers
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 2020 14:00:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105220017.15410-8-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105215953.GA15309@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit adds comments that label the MP tests' producer and consumer
processes, and also that label the "exists" clause as the bad outcome.

Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 .../litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus        | 6 +++---
 tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus      | 6 +++---
 .../litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus             | 6 +++---
 .../memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus  | 6 +++---
 tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus                   | 6 +++---
 tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus               | 6 +++---
 .../memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus | 6 +++---
 tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus                | 6 +++---
 8 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
index f15e501..c5c168d 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
@@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ C MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce
 	int flag;
 }
 
-P0(int *buf, int *flag)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag) // Producer
 {
 	WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
 	smp_wmb();
 	WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
 }
 
-P1(int *buf, int *flag)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag) // Consumer
 {
 	int r0;
 	int r1;
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ P1(int *buf, int *flag)
 	r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
 }
 
-exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
+exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
index ed8ee9b..20ff626 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
@@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ C MP+onceassign+derefonce
 	int y=0;
 }
 
-P0(int *x, int **p)
+P0(int *x, int **p) // Producer
 {
 	WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(*p, x);
 }
 
-P1(int *x, int **p)
+P1(int *x, int **p) // Consumer
 {
 	int *r0;
 	int r1;
@@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ P1(int *x, int **p)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-exists (1:r0=x /\ 1:r1=0)
+exists (1:r0=x /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
index b1b1266..153917a 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ C MP+polockmbonce+poacquiresilsil
 	int x;
 }
 
-P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
+P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x) // Producer
 {
 	spin_lock(lo);
 	smp_mb__after_spinlock();
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
 	spin_unlock(lo);
 }
 
-P1(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
+P1(spinlock_t *lo, int *x) // Consumer
 {
 	int r1;
 	int r2;
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ P1(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
 	r3 = spin_is_locked(lo);
 }
 
-exists (1:r1=1 /\ 1:r2=0 /\ 1:r3=1)
+exists (1:r1=1 /\ 1:r2=0 /\ 1:r3=1) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
index 867c75d..aad6439 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil.litmus
@@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ C MP+polockonce+poacquiresilsil
 	int x;
 }
 
-P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
+P0(spinlock_t *lo, int *x) // Producer
 {
 	spin_lock(lo);
 	WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
 	spin_unlock(lo);
 }
 
-P1(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
+P1(spinlock_t *lo, int *x) // Consumer
 {
 	int r1;
 	int r2;
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ P1(spinlock_t *lo, int *x)
 	r3 = spin_is_locked(lo);
 }
 
-exists (1:r1=1 /\ 1:r2=0 /\ 1:r3=1)
+exists (1:r1=1 /\ 1:r2=0 /\ 1:r3=1) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
index 4b0c2ed..21cbca6 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ C MP+polocks
 	int flag;
 }
 
-P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Producer
 {
 	WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
 	spin_lock(mylock);
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
 	spin_unlock(mylock);
 }
 
-P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Consumer
 {
 	int r0;
 	int r1;
@@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
 	r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
 }
 
-exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
+exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
index 3010bba..9f9769d 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ C MP+poonceonces
 	int flag;
 }
 
-P0(int *buf, int *flag)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag) // Producer
 {
 	WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
 	WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
 }
 
-P1(int *buf, int *flag)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag) // Consumer
 {
 	int r0;
 	int r1;
@@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ P1(int *buf, int *flag)
 	r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
 }
 
-exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
+exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
index 21e825d..cbe28e7 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
@@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ C MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce
 	int flag;
 }
 
-P0(int *buf, int *flag)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag) // Producer
 {
 	WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
 	smp_store_release(flag, 1);
 }
 
-P1(int *buf, int *flag)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag) // Consumer
 {
 	int r0;
 	int r1;
@@ -28,4 +28,4 @@ P1(int *buf, int *flag)
 	r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
 }
 
-exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)
+exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
index 9691d55..012041b 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
+++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ C MP+porevlocks
 	int flag;
 }
 
-P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Consumer
 {
 	int r0;
 	int r1;
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
 	spin_unlock(mylock);
 }
 
-P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
+P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Producer
 {
 	spin_lock(mylock);
 	WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
@@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock)
 	WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
 }
 
-exists (0:r0=1 /\ 0:r1=0)
+exists (0:r0=1 /\ 0:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)
-- 
2.9.5


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05 21:59 [PATCH memory-model 0/8] LKMM updates for v5.11 Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/8] tools: memory-model: Document that the LKMM can easily miss control dependencies paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/8] tools/memory-model: Move Documentation description to Documentation/README paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/8] tools/memory-model: Document categories of ordering primitives paulmck
2020-11-06 16:56   ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 19:11     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 4/8] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix a typo in CPU MEMORY BARRIERS section paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms paulmck
2020-11-06  1:47   ` Boqun Feng
2020-11-06 18:01     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07  3:07       ` Boqun Feng
2020-11-06 16:59   ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 18:04     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-06 19:23       ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 19:59         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-06 20:40           ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 21:04             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07  2:32               ` Alan Stern
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/8] tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests paulmck
2020-11-05 22:41   ` Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-05 22:56     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-25 11:34       ` Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-27 15:46         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-28  5:56           ` Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-28  6:00             ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/memory-model: Remove redundant initialization in " Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-28  6:01             ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/memory-model: Fix typo in klitmus7 compatibility table Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-29  3:33               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/8] tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` paulmck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201105220017.15410-8-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).