From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 11:07:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201107030702.GE3025@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106180102.GW3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:01:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:47:22AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:00:14PM -0800, paulmck@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..036fa28
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> > > +This document contains brief definitions of LKMM-related terms. Like most
> > > +glossaries, it is not intended to be read front to back (except perhaps
> > > +as a way of confirming a diagnosis of OCD), but rather to be searched
> > > +for specific terms.
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +Address Dependency: When the address of a later memory access is computed
> > > + based on the value returned by an earlier load, an "address
> > > + dependency" extends from that load extending to the later access.
> > > + Address dependencies are quite common in RCU read-side critical
> > > + sections:
> > > +
> > > + 1 rcu_read_lock();
> > > + 2 p = rcu_dereference(gp);
> > > + 3 do_something(p->a);
> > > + 4 rcu_read_unlock();
> > > +
> > > + In this case, because the address of "p->a" on line 3 is computed
> > > + from the value returned by the rcu_dereference() on line 2, the
> > > + address dependency extends from that rcu_dereference() to that
> > > + "p->a". In rare cases, optimizing compilers can destroy address
> > > + dependencies. Please see Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt
> > > + for more information.
> > > +
> > > + See also "Control Dependency".
> > > +
> > > +Acquire: With respect to a lock, acquiring that lock, for example,
> > > + using spin_lock(). With respect to a non-lock shared variable,
> > > + a special operation that includes a load and which orders that
> > > + load before later memory references running on that same CPU.
> > > + An example special acquire operation is smp_load_acquire(),
> > > + but atomic_read_acquire() and atomic_xchg_acquire() also include
> > > + acquire loads.
> > > +
> > > + When an acquire load returns the value stored by a release store
> > > + to that same variable, then all operations preceding that store
> >
> > Change this to:
> >
> > When an acquire load reads-from a release store
> >
> > , and put a reference to "Reads-from"? I think this makes the document
> > more consistent in that it makes clear "an acquire load returns the
> > value stored by a release store to the same variable" is not a special
> > case, it's simple a "Reads-from".
> >
> > > + happen before any operations following that load acquire.
> >
> > Add a reference to the definition of "happen before" in explanation.txt?
>
> How about as shown below? I currently am carrying this as a separate
> commit, but I might merge it into this one later on.
>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Regards,
Boqun
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 774a52cd3d80d6b657ae6c14c10bd9fc437068f3
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Date: Fri Nov 6 09:58:01 2020 -0800
>
> tools/memory-model: Tie acquire loads to reads-from
>
> This commit explicitly makes the connection between acquire loads and
> the reads-from relation. It also adds an entry for happens-before,
> and refers to the corresponding section of explanation.txt.
>
> Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> index 3924aca..383151b 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/glossary.txt
> @@ -33,10 +33,11 @@ Acquire: With respect to a lock, acquiring that lock, for example,
> acquire loads.
>
> When an acquire load returns the value stored by a release store
> - to that same variable, then all operations preceding that store
> - happen before any operations following that load acquire.
> + to that same variable, (in other words, the acquire load "reads
> + from" the release store), then all operations preceding that
> + store "happen before" any operations following that load acquire.
>
> - See also "Relaxed" and "Release".
> + See also "Happens-Before", "Reads-From", "Relaxed", and "Release".
>
> Coherence (co): When one CPU's store to a given variable overwrites
> either the value from another CPU's store or some later value,
> @@ -102,6 +103,11 @@ Fully Ordered: An operation such as smp_mb() that orders all of
> that orders all of its CPU's prior accesses, itself, and
> all of its CPU's subsequent accesses.
>
> +Happens-Before (hb): A relation between two accesses in which LKMM
> + guarantees the first access precedes the second. For more
> + detail, please see the "THE HAPPENS-BEFORE RELATION: hb"
> + section of explanation.txt.
> +
> Marked Access: An access to a variable that uses an special function or
> macro such as "r1 = READ_ONCE()" or "smp_store_release(&a, 1)".
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-07 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-05 21:59 [PATCH memory-model 0/8] LKMM updates for v5.11 Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/8] tools: memory-model: Document that the LKMM can easily miss control dependencies paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/8] tools/memory-model: Move Documentation description to Documentation/README paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/8] tools/memory-model: Document categories of ordering primitives paulmck
2020-11-06 16:56 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 19:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 4/8] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix a typo in CPU MEMORY BARRIERS section paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms paulmck
2020-11-06 1:47 ` Boqun Feng
2020-11-06 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07 3:07 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2020-11-06 16:59 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 18:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-06 19:23 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 19:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-06 20:40 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-06 21:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07 2:32 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/8] tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests paulmck
2020-11-05 22:41 ` Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-05 22:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-25 11:34 ` Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-27 15:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-28 5:56 ` Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-28 6:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/memory-model: Remove redundant initialization in " Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/memory-model: Fix typo in klitmus7 compatibility table Akira Yokosawa
2020-11-29 3:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/8] tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests paulmck
2020-11-05 22:00 ` [PATCH memory-model 8/8] tools/memory-model: Label MP tests' producers and consumers paulmck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201107030702.GE3025@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).