From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1419C433DB for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F82C64DEB for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233517AbhA2WL3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:11:29 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:40226 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233451AbhA2WL2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:11:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611958201; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=EmteIPPCRvA0Xzynl4Lpo4s2j4RCjrk806zB4G2tFZU=; b=YsF3RV6/+vZCxaMT/skQ9KKaBQtxV8zn+QSpjOVHETgvnMald0aD9JAhNApWEXv+o22zlJ C9vKRCZo3i13Oit+KXqu35rrLlJAgtukSmK2UOGjtsqjtJSW59xjERXIS/3+lXOKa6tx1A Kv7/DUtp+DE3+1hW2TFQ1hvpAhZyKuQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-464-a8cnRl7KP9u0P2t_e4T3Xw-1; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:09:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: a8cnRl7KP9u0P2t_e4T3Xw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E949802B45; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-112-64.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.64]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1D71A266; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 10TM9pe92192088 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:09:51 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 10TM9def2179650; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:09:39 +0100 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:09:39 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Nick Clifton , Sedat Dilek , Masahiro Yamada , Nathan Chancellor , Andrew Morton , LKML , Clang-Built-Linux ML , Linux Kbuild mailing list , linux-arch , Fangrui Song , Caroline Tice , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , Andrii Nakryiko , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arvind Sankar Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5 Message-ID: <20210129220939.GY4020736@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20210129194318.2125748-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20210129194318.2125748-3-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20210129205702.GS4020736@tucnak> <20210129211102.GT4020736@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 02:05:59PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Ah, I see. Then I should update the script I add > (scripts/test_dwarf5_support.sh) to feature detect that bug, since > it's the latest of the bunch. Also, should update my comment to note > that this requires binutils greater than 2.35.1 (which is what I have, > which fails, since the backport landed in ... what?!) How was this > backported to 2.35 > (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195#c12, Jan 26 > 2021) when binutils-2_35_1 was tagged sept 19 2020? Or will there be > a binutils 2.35.2 point release? AFAIK yes, soon. Jakub