Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-21T08:32:31Z

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
>
> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
> wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 4 ++--
> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 2 +-
> fs/exec.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>