From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] powerpc, arm64: Mark __switch_to() as __sched
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:15:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202110220914.11A7C074AF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211022152104.419533274@infradead.org>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Unlike most of the other architectures, PowerPC and ARM64 have
> __switch_to() as a C function which remains on the stack. Their
> respective __get_wchan() skips one stack frame unconditionally,
> without testing is_sched_functions().
>
> Mark them __sched such that we can forgo that special case.
I wonder if this change will improve any benchmarks? (i.e. this will
move __switch_to into the scheduler section, maybe improving icache?)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -490,8 +490,8 @@ void update_sctlr_el1(u64 sctlr)
> /*
> * Thread switching.
> */
> -__notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> - struct task_struct *next)
> +__notrace_funcgraph __sched
> +struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
> {
> struct task_struct *last;
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -1201,8 +1201,8 @@ static inline void restore_sprs(struct t
>
> }
>
> -struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> - struct task_struct *new)
> +__sched struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> + struct task_struct *new)
> {
> struct thread_struct *new_thread, *old_thread;
> struct task_struct *last;
>
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-22 15:09 [PATCH 0/7] arch: More wchan fixes Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: Fix __get_wchan() for !STACKTRACE Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:25 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] stacktrace,sched: Make stack_trace_save_tsk() more robust Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:25 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:57 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 16:54 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-25 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-25 20:52 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-26 9:33 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-25 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: implement ARCH_STACKWALK Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:18 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] arch: Make ARCH_STACKWALK independent of STACKTRACE Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:18 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 17:06 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc, arm64: Mark __switch_to() as __sched Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:15 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-10-22 17:40 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] arch: __get_wchan() || ARCH_STACKWALK Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:13 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 17:52 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests: proc: Make sure wchan works when it exists Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:27 ` [PATCH 0/7] arch: More wchan fixes Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202110220914.11A7C074AF@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox