public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] powerpc, arm64: Mark __switch_to() as __sched
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:15:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202110220914.11A7C074AF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211022152104.419533274@infradead.org>

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Unlike most of the other architectures, PowerPC and ARM64 have
> __switch_to() as a C function which remains on the stack. Their
> respective __get_wchan() skips one stack frame unconditionally,
> without testing is_sched_functions().
> 
> Mark them __sched such that we can forgo that special case.

I wonder if this change will improve any benchmarks? (i.e. this will
move __switch_to into the scheduler section, maybe improving icache?)

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c   |    4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -490,8 +490,8 @@ void update_sctlr_el1(u64 sctlr)
>  /*
>   * Thread switching.
>   */
> -__notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> -				struct task_struct *next)
> +__notrace_funcgraph __sched
> +struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *last;
>  
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -1201,8 +1201,8 @@ static inline void restore_sprs(struct t
>  
>  }
>  
> -struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> -	struct task_struct *new)
> +__sched struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> +					struct task_struct *new)
>  {
>  	struct thread_struct *new_thread, *old_thread;
>  	struct task_struct *last;
> 
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-22 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 15:09 [PATCH 0/7] arch: More wchan fixes Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: Fix __get_wchan() for !STACKTRACE Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:25   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] stacktrace,sched: Make stack_trace_save_tsk() more robust Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:25   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 16:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:57       ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 16:54     ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 17:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-25 20:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-25 20:52           ` Kees Cook
2021-10-26  9:33           ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-25 16:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: implement ARCH_STACKWALK Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:18   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] arch: Make ARCH_STACKWALK independent of STACKTRACE Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:18   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 16:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 17:06   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc, arm64: Mark __switch_to() as __sched Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:15   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-10-22 17:40   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] arch: __get_wchan() || ARCH_STACKWALK Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:13   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 17:52   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests: proc: Make sure wchan works when it exists Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:27 ` [PATCH 0/7] arch: More wchan fixes Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202110220914.11A7C074AF@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox