From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FEDC433EF for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 16:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236392AbiDWQie (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Apr 2022 12:38:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38414 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236383AbiDWQie (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Apr 2022 12:38:34 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D03D1B76; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id q129so12443271oif.4; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:35:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+ovHkGKEvlIZwtQ9aFgXnHkHqXOrvd8sanG2BE5UeV4=; b=CE/MNPBnre0f1a6TKBwmofViVrKgJ05IptkoHG1SdPEtiyLXvKTXsLuufocRXtSDng d5JDRBbSvHcatQBIXa+ToEZ/CMq9zT1djryIQ5zcdnOnSe+yXhXEZlvTs5rpDKoElDv3 9TzUJIsoXr8AtXlK7UwMYZ/CbkWlOlVcvSxY75jobolML9RVUS8/jaz4/AMyaeT76p2I DZ1b+YsCWiiLUTXfF+xMgDWSoNsdbRrSiLveQScgNblUdZ+1HoyVR55+vS5Fe33LKauy 1vrB6j57yhXhHlPLGOwAfRabCTuiY6DgbIZZejJ200pt5FAVUxCzHxW56KLFn4GIwD+7 PkFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+ovHkGKEvlIZwtQ9aFgXnHkHqXOrvd8sanG2BE5UeV4=; b=56nRSa57T9xvAY6Mgfqj7CyC0dYxV2JXPuDwDmFzuGDzwemBL6VYBRXgp32bWSxpjl 5SXfIU+SRO910nF+tI+mCX5O2qeuRB5uOJpNm+wPPHHRRtoOVJl/+R6QBC+Ht3nvW3Q3 6NNr3E0OLxsKNSxT+HFd9q8ZfC74oXK7dSA2XaUpDyrzdqLHSdiMSlo0CNk9ZN60y/AL 1/AO6/zu9vX0F1s0Bi4onuCSgBnfJ4baCt9dU2tgImad4TnnfDVSgZ4gQVqBDpuZbE+M ZmXJTLHsdUsUAKxSjMdyCedWJLuozUAIS9ZbaJib5hxe+uAivYGD1ADhWT3iHEg7w8mt 6WCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SJuQrmiZrkX6F+nXUI6DVH7zZ5BiWHI+dbJhjI9bNzqrsdeoB xPXkHoy9xSYiBy99/N4r9rQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUhgOA/L7vBlij2I/59HEEJY7wUxIWCqzShnoqp2lck8+Dlp3S/SGRjv16vWtHRMXQnI72kA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:de84:0:b0:2f9:c97c:421c with SMTP id v126-20020acade84000000b002f9c97c421cmr4636599oig.46.1650731736174; Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12-20020a4aea0c000000b0035195c4662fsm2163837ood.9.2022.04.23.09.35.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:35:33 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: LKML , Linux Crypto Mailing List , linux-arch , Dinh Nguyen , Nick Hu , Max Filippov , Palmer Dabbelt , "David S . Miller" , Yoshinori Sato , Michal Simek , Borislav Petkov , Guo Ren , Geert Uytterhoeven , Joshua Kinard , David Laight , Dominik Brodowski , Eric Biggers , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Lennart Poettering , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] random: block in /dev/urandom Message-ID: <20220423163533.GB3964519@roeck-us.net> References: <20220217162848.303601-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20220322155820.GA1745955@roeck-us.net> <20220423135631.GB3958174@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 06:56:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Looks like your code is already in -next; I see the same failures in > > your tree and there. > > It's not in next, actually. The branch I made for you has that > additional testing commit. > Hmm, then I can't really test it because the other 16 patches in your branch (which are in -next) already cause a number of failures. Guenter