From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <jthierry@redhat.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <masahiroy@kernel.org>, <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <ycote@redhat.com>,
<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
<chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 08/37] objtool: arm64: Decode load/store instructions
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:43:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220429094355.122389-9-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429094355.122389-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
From: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
Decode load/store operations and create corresponding stack_ops for
operations targeting SP or FP.
Operations storing/loading multiple registers are split into separate
stack_ops storing single registers.
Operations modifying the base register get an additional stack_op
for the register update. Since the atomic register(s) load/store + base
register update gets split into multiple operations, to make sure
objtool always sees a valid stack, consider store instruction to perform
stack allocations (i.e. modifying the base pointer before the storing)
and loads de-allocations (i.e. modifying the base pointer after the
load).
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
---
tools/objtool/arch/arm64/decode.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/arm64/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/arm64/decode.c
index b07e0f51637e..4a868945dcfb 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/arm64/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/arm64/decode.c
@@ -112,6 +112,48 @@ int arch_decode_hint_reg(u8 sp_reg, int *base)
return -1;
}
+static struct stack_op *arm_make_store_op(enum aarch64_insn_register base,
+ enum aarch64_insn_register reg,
+ int offset)
+{
+ struct stack_op *op;
+
+ op = calloc(1, sizeof(*op));
+ if (!op) {
+ WARN("calloc failed");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ op->dest.type = OP_DEST_REG_INDIRECT;
+ op->dest.reg = base;
+ op->dest.offset = offset;
+ op->src.type = OP_SRC_REG;
+ op->src.reg = reg;
+ op->src.offset = 0;
+
+ return op;
+}
+
+static struct stack_op *arm_make_load_op(enum aarch64_insn_register base,
+ enum aarch64_insn_register reg,
+ int offset)
+{
+ struct stack_op *op;
+
+ op = calloc(1, sizeof(*op));
+ if (!op) {
+ WARN("calloc failed");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ op->dest.type = OP_DEST_REG;
+ op->dest.reg = reg;
+ op->dest.offset = 0;
+ op->src.type = OP_SRC_REG_INDIRECT;
+ op->src.reg = base;
+ op->src.offset = offset;
+
+ return op;
+}
+
static struct stack_op *arm_make_add_op(enum aarch64_insn_register dest,
enum aarch64_insn_register src,
int val)
@@ -132,6 +174,98 @@ static struct stack_op *arm_make_add_op(enum aarch64_insn_register dest,
return op;
}
+static int arm_decode_load_store(u32 insn, unsigned long *immediate,
+ struct list_head *ops_list)
+{
+ enum aarch64_insn_register base;
+ enum aarch64_insn_register rt;
+ struct stack_op *op;
+ int size;
+ int offset;
+
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_single(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_load_single(insn))
+ size = 1 << ((insn & GENMASK(31, 30)) >> 30);
+ else
+ size = 4 << ((insn >> 31) & 1);
+
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_imm(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_load_imm(insn))
+ *immediate = size * aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_12,
+ insn);
+ else if (aarch64_insn_is_store_pre(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_load_pre(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_store_post(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_load_post(insn))
+ *immediate = sign_extend(aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_9,
+ insn),
+ 9);
+ else if (aarch64_insn_is_stp(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_ldp(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_stp_pre(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_ldp_pre(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_stp_post(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_ldp_post(insn))
+ *immediate = size * sign_extend(aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_7,
+ insn),
+ 7);
+ else
+ return 1;
+
+ base = aarch64_insn_decode_register(AARCH64_INSN_REGTYPE_RN, insn);
+ if (base != AARCH64_INSN_REG_FP && base != AARCH64_INSN_REG_SP)
+ return 0;
+
+ offset = *immediate;
+
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_pre(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_stp_pre(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_store_post(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_stp_post(insn)) {
+ op = arm_make_add_op(base, base, *immediate);
+ list_add_tail(&op->list, ops_list);
+
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_post(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_stp_post(insn))
+ offset = -*immediate;
+ else
+ offset = 0;
+ } else if (aarch64_insn_is_load_post(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_ldp_post(insn)) {
+ offset = 0;
+ }
+
+ /* First register */
+ rt = aarch64_insn_decode_register(AARCH64_INSN_REGTYPE_RT, insn);
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_single(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_store_pair(insn))
+ op = arm_make_store_op(base, rt, offset);
+ else
+ op = arm_make_load_op(base, rt, offset);
+
+ if (!op)
+ return -1;
+ list_add_tail(&op->list, ops_list);
+
+ /* Second register (if present) */
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_pair(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_load_pair(insn)) {
+ rt = aarch64_insn_decode_register(AARCH64_INSN_REGTYPE_RT2,
+ insn);
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_store_pair(insn))
+ op = arm_make_store_op(base, rt, offset + size);
+ else
+ op = arm_make_load_op(base, rt, offset + size);
+ if (!op)
+ return -1;
+ list_add_tail(&op->list, ops_list);
+ }
+
+ if (aarch64_insn_is_load_pre(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_ldp_pre(insn) ||
+ aarch64_insn_is_load_post(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_ldp_post(insn)) {
+ op = arm_make_add_op(base, base, *immediate);
+ if (!op)
+ return -1;
+ list_add_tail(&op->list, ops_list);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int arm_decode_add_sub_imm(u32 instr, bool set_flags,
unsigned long *immediate,
struct list_head *ops_list)
@@ -247,6 +381,16 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objtool_file *file, const struct section *sec
*immediate = aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_16, insn);
}
break;
+ case AARCH64_INSN_CLS_LDST:
+ {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = arm_decode_load_store(insn, immediate, ops_list);
+ if (ret <= 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ break;
+ }
default:
break;
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 9:43 [RFC PATCH v4 00/37] objtool: add base support for arm64 Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/37] tools: Add some generic functions and headers Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/37] tools: arm64: Make aarch64 instruction decoder available to tools Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/37] tools: bug: Remove duplicate definition Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/37] objtool: arm64: Add base definition for arm64 backend Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/37] objtool: arm64: Decode add/sub instructions Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/37] objtool: arm64: Decode jump and call related instructions Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/37] objtool: arm64: Decode other system instructions Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` Chen Zhongjin [this message]
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/37] objtool: arm64: Decode LDR instructions Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/37] objtool: arm64: Accept non-instruction data in code sections Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/37] objtool: arm64: Handle supported relocations in alternatives Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/37] objtool: arm64: Ignore replacement section for alternative callback Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/37] objtool: arm64: Enable stack validation for arm64 Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/37] objtool: check: Support data in text section Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/37] objtool: arm64: Add unwind_hint support Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/37] arm64: Add annotate_reachable() for objtools Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/37] arm64: bug: Add reachable annotation to warning macros Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/37] arm64: kgdb: Mark code following kgdb brk as reachable Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/37] arm64: irq-gic: Replace unreachable() with -EINVAL Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/37] arm64: Set intra-function call annotations Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/37] arm64: kernel: Skip validation of proton-pack.c.c and hibernate.c Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/37] arm64: kernel: Skip validation of kuser32.o Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-05 3:36 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-05 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-05 10:56 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-06 2:18 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-06 10:06 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-07 6:35 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-06 17:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/37] arm64: kernel: Skip validation of sigreturn32.o Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/37] arm64: ftrace: Skip validation of entry-ftrace.o Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/37] arm64: bpf: Skip validation of ___bpf_prog_run Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-29 20:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/37] arm64: crypto: Remove unnecessary stackframe Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/37] arm64: sleep: Properly set frame pointer before call Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/37] arm64: Change symbol annotations Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 29/37] arm64: efi-header: Mark efi header as data Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 30/37] arm64: head: Mark constants " Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 31/37] arm64: proc: Mark constant " Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 32/37] arm64: crypto: Mark data in code sections Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 33/37] arm64: Annotate ASM symbols with unknown stack state Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 34/37] arm64: entry: Annotate valid stack in kernel entry Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 35/37] arm64: entry: Annotate code switching to tasks Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 36/37] arm64: entry: Align stack size for alternative Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-29 9:43 ` [RFC PATCH v4 37/37] arm64: kvm: Annotate stack state for guest enter/exit code Chen Zhongjin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220429094355.122389-9-chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
--to=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ycote@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox