From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Maciej Fijalkowski" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:37:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220622143739.291698-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrMlrjbue7twWLk1@smile.fi.intel.com>
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:22:38 +0300
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:15:45 +0200
> >
> > > While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed
> > > type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in
> > > places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but
> > > also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the
> > > following code:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Oh gosh, now s390 failed and 7/8 revealed one existing code flaw in
> > the ice driver.
> > I'll fix those, then will try to test more platforms (to not spam
> > series again) and send v5 soon (mentioning this as bots CCs only
> > myself).
>
> One mail per person? Because I also got a report.
From the headers:
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
<kbuild-all@lists.01.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
I guess it's due to your Reviewed-by in the commit message, no one
else from the original CCs list is present.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Thanks,
Olek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 19:15 [PATCH v4 0/8] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] ia64, processor: fix -Wincompatible-pointer-types in ia64_get_irr() Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] bitops: unify non-atomic bitops prototypes across architectures Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] bitops: define const_*() versions of the non-atomics Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] bitops: wrap non-atomic bitops with a transparent macro Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] bitmap: don't assume compiler evaluates small mem*() builtins calls Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 19:15 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] lib: test_bitmap: add compile-time optimization/evaluations assertions Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-22 16:04 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-22 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-22 14:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-22 14:37 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220622143739.291698-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--to=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox