From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mips: add <asm-generic/io.h> including
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 17:45:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202305261736.cBisGOAz-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230519195135.79600-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Hi Jiaxun,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.4-rc3 next-20230525]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiaxun-Yang/mips-add-asm-generic-io-h-including/20230520-035318
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230519195135.79600-1-jiaxun.yang%40flygoat.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4] mips: add <asm-generic/io.h> including
config: mips-randconfig-r015-20230525 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230526/202305261736.cBisGOAz-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4faf3aaf28226a4e950c103a14f6fc1d1fdabb1b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
mkdir -p ~/bin
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install mips cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-mips-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/4f10a6993ab8060829908b87cdeea41f7eae38e7
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jiaxun-Yang/mips-add-asm-generic-io-h-including/20230520-035318
git checkout 4f10a6993ab8060829908b87cdeea41f7eae38e7
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=mips olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=mips SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/mmc/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305261736.cBisGOAz-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c:41:
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h:506:9: warning: '__raw_writeq' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
#define __raw_writeq(__value, __reg) \
^
arch/mips/include/asm/io.h:566:9: note: previous definition is here
#define __raw_writeq __raw_writeq
^
In file included from drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c:41:
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h:508:9: warning: '__raw_readq' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
#define __raw_readq(__reg) (*(volatile u64 __force *)(__reg))
^
arch/mips/include/asm/io.h:562:9: note: previous definition is here
#define __raw_readq __raw_readq
^
2 warnings generated.
vim +/__raw_writeq +506 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
76184ac17edf3c Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 473
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 474 /* Register access macros */
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 475 #define mci_readl(dev, reg) \
a2f17680f42878 Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 476 readl_relaxed((dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg)
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 477 #define mci_writel(dev, reg, value) \
a2f17680f42878 Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 478 writel_relaxed((value), (dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg)
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 479
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 480 /* 16-bit FIFO access macros */
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 481 #define mci_readw(dev, reg) \
a2f17680f42878 Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 482 readw_relaxed((dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg)
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 483 #define mci_writew(dev, reg, value) \
a2f17680f42878 Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 484 writew_relaxed((value), (dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg)
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 485
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 486 /* 64-bit FIFO access macros */
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 487 #ifdef readq
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 488 #define mci_readq(dev, reg) \
a2f17680f42878 Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 489 readq_relaxed((dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg)
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 490 #define mci_writeq(dev, reg, value) \
a2f17680f42878 Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 491 writeq_relaxed((value), (dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg)
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 492 #else
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 493 /*
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 494 * Dummy readq implementation for architectures that don't define it.
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 495 *
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 496 * We would assume that none of these architectures would configure
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 497 * the IP block with a 64bit FIFO width, so this code will never be
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 498 * executed on those machines. Defining these macros here keeps the
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 499 * rest of the code free from ifdefs.
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 500 */
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 501 #define mci_readq(dev, reg) \
892b1e312b1791 James Hogan 2011-06-24 502 (*(volatile u64 __force *)((dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg))
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 503 #define mci_writeq(dev, reg, value) \
892b1e312b1791 James Hogan 2011-06-24 504 (*(volatile u64 __force *)((dev)->regs + SDMMC_##reg) = (value))
76184ac17edf3c Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 505
76184ac17edf3c Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 @506 #define __raw_writeq(__value, __reg) \
76184ac17edf3c Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 507 (*(volatile u64 __force *)(__reg) = (__value))
76184ac17edf3c Ben Dooks 2015-03-25 @508 #define __raw_readq(__reg) (*(volatile u64 __force *)(__reg))
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 509 #endif
f95f3850f7a9e1 Will Newton 2011-01-02 510
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-26 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 19:51 [PATCH v4] mips: add <asm-generic/io.h> including Jiaxun Yang
2023-05-19 21:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-19 21:41 ` Jiaxun Yang
2023-05-20 14:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2023-05-20 15:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-20 3:24 ` Baoquan He
2023-05-26 9:45 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202305261736.cBisGOAz-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).