From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EE4D6D; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 06:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SflhY4hnBz67nWS; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 22:49:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CDE1408FF; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 22:53:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:53:33 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:53:32 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Russell King (Oracle)" CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , , , James Morse , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] drivers: base: add arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable() Message-ID: <20231128145332.000070e0@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:30:04 +0000 "Russell King (Oracle)" wrote: > The differences between architecture specific implementations of > arch_register_cpu() are down to whether the CPU is hotpluggable or not. > Rather than overriding the weak version of arch_register_cpu(), provide > a function that can be used to provide this detail instead. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron