linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	John Sanpe <sanpeqf@gmail.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Uladzislau Koshchanka <koshchanka@gmail.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	dakr@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 5/5] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap()
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:05:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123210553.GA326783@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240111085540.7740-6-pstanner@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:55:40AM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> The implementation of pci_iounmap() is currently scattered over two
> files, drivers/pci/iomap.c and lib/iomap.c. Additionally,
> architectures can define their own version.
> 
> To have only one version, it's necessary to create a helper function,
> iomem_is_ioport(), that tells pci_iounmap() whether the passed address
> points to an ioport or normal memory.
> 
> iomem_is_ioport() can be provided through two different ways:
>   1. The architecture itself provides it. As of today, the version
>      coming from lib/iomap.c de facto is the x86-specific version and
>      comes into play when CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is selected. This rather
>      confusing naming is an artifact left by the removal of IA64.
>   2. As a default version in include/asm-generic/io.h for those
>      architectures that don't use CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP, but also don't
>      provide their own version of iomem_is_ioport().
> 
> Once all architectures that support ports provide iomem_is_ioport(), the
> arch-specific definitions for pci_iounmap() can be removed and the archs
> can use the generic implementation, instead.
> 
> Create a unified version of pci_iounmap() in drivers/pci/iomap.c.
> Provide the function iomem_is_ioport() in include/asm-generic/io.h
> (generic) and lib/iomap.c ("pseudo-generic" for x86).
> 
> Remove the CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP guard around
> ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_PCI_IOUNMAP so that configs that set
> CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP without CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP still get the
> function.
> 
> Add TODOs for follow-up work on the "generic is not generic but
> x86-specific"-Problem.
> ...

> +++ b/drivers/pci/iomap.c
> @@ -135,44 +135,30 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_wc);
>  
>  /*
> - * pci_iounmap() somewhat illogically comes from lib/iomap.c for the
> - * CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP case, because that's the code that knows about
> - * the different IOMAP ranges.
> + * This check is still necessary due to legacy reasons.
>   *
> - * But if the architecture does not use the generic iomap code, and if
> - * it has _not_ defined it's own private pci_iounmap function, we define
> - * it here.
> - *
> - * NOTE! This default implementation assumes that if the architecture
> - * support ioport mapping (HAS_IOPORT_MAP), the ioport mapping will
> - * be fixed to the range [ PCI_IOBASE, PCI_IOBASE+IO_SPACE_LIMIT [,
> - * and does not need unmapping with 'ioport_unmap()'.
> - *
> - * If you have different rules for your architecture, you need to
> - * implement your own pci_iounmap() that knows the rules for where
> - * and how IO vs MEM get mapped.
> - *
> - * This code is odd, and the ARCH_HAS/ARCH_WANTS #define logic comes
> - * from legacy <asm-generic/io.h> header file behavior. In particular,
> - * it would seem to make sense to do the iounmap(p) for the non-IO-space
> - * case here regardless, but that's not what the old header file code
> - * did. Probably incorrectly, but this is meant to be bug-for-bug
> - * compatible.

Moving this comment update to the patch that adds the ioport_unmap()
call would make that patch more consistent and simplify this patch.

> + * TODO: Have all architectures that provide their own pci_iounmap() provide
> + * iomem_is_ioport() instead. Remove this #if afterwards.
>   */
>  #if defined(ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_PCI_IOUNMAP)
>  
> -void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *p)
> +/**
> + * pci_iounmap - Unmapp a mapping
> + * @dev: PCI device the mapping belongs to
> + * @addr: start address of the mapping
> + *
> + * Unmapp a PIO or MMIO mapping.

s/Unmapp/Unmap/ (twice)

> + */
> +void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *addr)

Maybe move the "p" to "addr" rename to the patch that fixes the
pci_iounmap() #ifdef problem, since that's a trivial change that
already has to do with handling both PIO and MMIO?  Then this patch
would be a little more focused.

The kernel-doc addition could possibly also move there since it isn't
related to the unification.

>  {
> -#ifdef ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_IOPORT_MAP
> -	uintptr_t start = (uintptr_t) PCI_IOBASE;
> -	uintptr_t addr = (uintptr_t) p;
> -
> -	if (addr >= start && addr < start + IO_SPACE_LIMIT) {
> -		ioport_unmap(p);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP
> +	if (iomem_is_ioport(addr)) {
> +		ioport_unmap(addr);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  #endif
> -	iounmap(p);
> +
> +	iounmap(addr);
>  }

> + * If CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is selected and the architecture does NOT provide its
> + * own version, ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT makes sure that the generic
> + * version from asm-generic/io.h is NOT used and instead the second "generic"
> + * version from this file here is used.
> + *
> + * There are currently two generic versions because of a difficult cleanup
> + * process. Namely, the version in lib/iomap.c once was really generic when IA64
> + * still existed. Today, it's only really used by x86.
> + *
> + * TODO: Move this function to x86-specific code.

Some of these TODOs look fairly simple.  Are they actually hard, or
could they just be done now?

It seems like implementing iomem_is_ioport() for the other arches
would be straightforward and if done first, could make this patch look
tidier.

Or if the TODOs can't be done now, maybe the iomem_is_ioport()
addition could be done as a separate patch to make the unification
more obvious.

> + */
> +#if defined(ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT)
> +bool iomem_is_ioport(void __iomem *addr)
>  {
> -	IO_COND(addr, /* nothing */, iounmap(addr));
> +	unsigned long port = (unsigned long __force)addr;
> +
> +	if (port > PIO_OFFSET && port < PIO_RESERVED)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iounmap);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
> +#endif /* ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT */
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-23 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-11  8:55 [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code Philipp Stanner
2024-01-11  8:55 ` [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/5] lib/pci_iomap.c: fix cleanup bugs in pci_iounmap() Philipp Stanner
2024-01-23 18:46   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-25 16:06     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-01-11  8:55 ` [PATCH v5 RESEND 2/5] lib: move pci_iomap.c to drivers/pci/ Philipp Stanner
2024-01-23 20:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-25 14:54     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-01-25 18:31       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-11  8:55 ` [PATCH v5 RESEND 3/5] lib: move pci-specific devres code " Philipp Stanner
2024-01-11  8:55 ` [PATCH v5 RESEND 4/5] pci: move devres code from pci.c to devres.c Philipp Stanner
2024-01-11  8:55 ` [PATCH v5 RESEND 5/5] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap() Philipp Stanner
2024-01-23 21:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-01-26 13:59     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-01-26 14:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-27 22:39       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-29 10:43         ` Philipp Stanner
2024-01-29 18:14           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-11  9:03 ` [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code Johannes Berg
2024-01-11  9:14   ` Philipp Stanner
2024-01-11  9:22     ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-11 14:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-11 15:32   ` Philipp Stanner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240123210553.GA326783@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=koshchanka@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=sanpeqf@gmail.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).