From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com,
cl@gentwo.org, memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
joao.m.martins@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait()
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 13:49:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203214911.898276-4-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203214911.898276-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(), a timed variant of
smp_cond_load_relaxed().
This uses __cmpwait_relaxed() to do the actual waiting, with the
event-stream guaranteeing that we wake up from WFE periodically
and not block forever in case there are no stores to the cacheline.
For cases when the event-stream is unavailable, fallback to the
generic spin-wait implementation.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
index 1ca947d5c939..25721275a5a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -216,6 +216,44 @@ do { \
(typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
})
+#define __smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(ptr, cond_expr, \
+ time_expr_ns, time_limit_ns) \
+({ \
+ typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \
+ __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL; \
+ for (;;) { \
+ VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
+ if (cond_expr) \
+ break; \
+ __cmpwait_relaxed(__PTR, VAL); \
+ if ((time_expr_ns) >= (time_limit_ns)) \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ (typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
+})
+
+/*
+ * For the unlikely case that the event-stream is unavailable,
+ * ward off the possibility of waiting forever by falling back
+ * to the generic spin-wait.
+ */
+#define smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(ptr, cond_expr, \
+ time_expr_ns, time_limit_ns) \
+({ \
+ __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) _val; \
+ int __wfe = arch_timer_evtstrm_available(); \
+ \
+ if (likely(__wfe)) \
+ _val = __smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(ptr, cond_expr, \
+ time_expr_ns, \
+ time_limit_ns); \
+ else \
+ _val = __smp_cond_load_relaxed_spinwait(ptr, cond_expr, \
+ time_expr_ns, \
+ time_limit_ns); \
+ (typeof(*ptr))_val; \
+})
+
#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 21:49 [PATCH 0/4] barrier: Introduce smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-02-03 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-03-04 19:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-06 7:53 ` Ankur Arora
2025-03-11 8:48 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-03-12 6:34 ` Ankur Arora
2025-03-09 3:26 ` Ankur Arora
2025-02-03 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-02-03 21:49 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2025-03-04 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait() Catalin Marinas
2025-03-06 7:58 ` Ankur Arora
2025-02-03 21:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-02-14 22:42 ` Okanovic, Haris
2025-02-18 21:44 ` Ankur Arora
2025-02-06 10:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] barrier: Introduce smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-18 21:48 ` Ankur Arora
2025-03-03 21:28 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203214911.898276-4-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).